Followed with the wrap a fish and it still stinks comment obama made there was no mistake about what he meant.
obama thinks he is smarter then everyone in the room and he’s laughing his butt off at getting back at Gov Palin for her community organizer remark.
Now we know that where Gov Palin hit him with community organizer remark hurt him the most. And he came back low and dirty. So now we know who he is and how he fights.
WHY?
You can put lipstick on B. Hussein but he’s still a Muslim.
The lipstick reference, says it all. He tried to be slick by mentioning a phrase Republicans had used in the past but by the reaction the crowd gave him after the quote he knew and we knew what he meant. He un comedically delivered a nasty shot at Palin got the crowd reaction he antisapated, smiled, and acted like a little school boy who said a bad word.
He is a first class fool!
Pretty simple really....Obama doesn’t in his heart think Palin is a pig, but he choose that comment specifically because of what Palin’s lipstick comment. He knew what he was doing. It’s time to let it go.
Frankly, I disagree with you. The reaction of the crowd showed me he was throwing it out there to rebut Sarah’s comment or make of Sarah’s comment. To be honest with you, you can put lipstick on a Barack Hussein Obama and you still have a Barack Hussein Obama with lipstick!
Here are links (I hope) to 2 separate videos of Obama flipping off Hillary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw
That sealed the deal for me...
You can tell that Obama’s “lipstick” remark is personally directed towards Palin because of the “fish” remark that followed it.
It is true that the “lipstick” line is usually used to describe legislation - especially when that legislation is a revised bill.
However, the “old fish wrapped in paper” metaphor has never been used in such a context to my knowledge.
The “old fish” remark could be construed as a personal attack towards McCain.
Here’s how. If you haven’t noticed, McCain doesn’t look like he goes out in the sun a lot.
He in fact doesn’t, because of his previous bouts with melanoma.
So he’s pretty light skinned - in fact, if you wanted to insult him personally, you could say he’s fish-belly white.
Hence, the “old fish” is actually a metaphor for McCain himself, not his policy.
It follows then that the preceding “lipstick” remark was also intended personally, but that time towards Palin.
After insulting Palin personally, Obama must’ve felt a need to insult the other half of the ticket.
It’s too bad that the press missed that one, because the “fish” remark could be construed as both racist and as making fun
of McCain’s cancer history. That’s much more damaging to Obama than the “lipstick” insult.
My mistake.
Didn’t realize right away that the two videos are really taken from different angles of the same speech.
Sorry
Anybody think OBama’s people do not look at the DNC web blog ?
I take it back.No more benefit of the doubt for Obama.
I found this on the DNC web blog site...from 08/30/08.
http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/elizabethberry/Cgsq
Good presentation.
There in No Question Obama meant to call Mrs. Palin a pig with his “Lipstick on a Pig” comment. And right after that, he called McCain a “Rotten old fish.” This is filthy, unacceptable speech, and what we should have expected from the Dims.
I too, am prepared to accept that Obama’s comments are PUUUUURE coincidence coming less than a week after Palin’s “lipstick” joke. It’s just not possible that his comments had anything to do with her identifying herself as a pitbull with lipstick just a few days earlier. He was going to use that joke of his anyway and Sarah’s lipstick joke had nothing to do with Obama’s “pig with lipstick” joke. Heck, even the people in his audience were caught completely by surprise and had no idea at all that Obama’s innocent joke might have been referring to Sarah. Let me re-iterate, the “pig with lipstick” attack had nothing to do with Sarah’s comments just 5 days earlier. It’s strains all logic that Obama would stoop to such a low blow. After all, how could the second coming of the Messiah, resort to gutter politics? You people just don’t understand how innocently his “pig with lipstick” comment was. Shame on all of you.
His voting block thinks he called her a pig and they agree. I heard it over some hip hop channel while I was changing stations. Now the comment came from a woman and the men were trying to talk over her saying it was just a mistake. Either way he needs to say he would never refer to an opponent as a pig.
I think this will be an interesting way to determine who reads the entire article before posting. ;O)
I think, rather that Obama is TOTALLY CLUELESS,
COMPLETELY OUT-OF-TOUCH, UNIMAGINABLY NAÏVE, INCREDIBLY INSENSITIVE, AND STUPID BEYOND ANYONE’S WILDEST DREAMS ... and a nasty SOB to boot.
Note that “the finger” came out the day after he blew the debate in Philadelphia. The “Lipstick/Pig” came out the day after he fell behind in the polls.
When the going gets tough, Obama reveals his inner vicious little prick.