I already have.
If you have seriously studied Victor's book, then your arguments here don't indicate it. All I can see is you're shooting down straw men, throwing out red hearings, and piling on loads of insults.
If that's the best you can do, it's not serious argumentation, and speaks poorly of you. So I prefer to think you've just not read his book, and you just assume he's as big a nut-case as FOR SURE, some of the others are.
Here's the bottom line: the charge that "FDR knew" has been out there since December 8, 1941. It has not gone away, and will not ever, because there is serious evidence to back it up. What Victor does is put all that evidence in a context which, to me at least -- as one who hugely admires FDR's war winning strategy -- makes perfect sense.
That's why I suggest you carefully consider it.