Posted on 09/07/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by jern
The chattering classes read the NYT. Even though probably half of the people who get the NYT will actually read the article, it will be television fodder for weeks.
I guess they want to go out in a blaze of glory before Proctor & Gamble buys them and starts printing the same thing, only with a softer material and perforations for easy use.
Her water didn’t break.
NYT loading up the lyrics for the Karaoke Media Machine again!
ROFL!!!
If they do this it will backfire big time; I too am cautious of the Drudge story, we will have to wait and see.
If they do it, expect all NYTimes reporters on the campaign trail with McCain/Palin to be kicked off the bus/plane.
Maybe they are going to “expose” the fact that she didn’t abort a downsyn child. That is actually a totally immoral and unforgivable act to the left. Add to that the act of permitting her daughter to not abort the premarital child and Sarah Palin is an utterly unspeakable person unit.
“What they going do say that Karl Rove is father of little baby???”
What???
You mean she gave birth in 24 Business hours????
Figures. I said in another thread that the left wing blogs were just mouthy and ineffective but that Obama and Axelrod are working to invent something big. They are pros and cover their tracks well. I figured it would take about this long to get it done.
If Sarah was pregant when she got married, who cares? This would be a first? Hardly. I think the NYT, must have found out that Trig is gay! ;)
IF that is what happened.
Shhh. I heard on another post that he's now known as Kurt Grove, and working on Obama's strategy team or something.
Drudge has updated the caption with a photo of a beaming Sarah, Todd and Trig. No details yet.
What the hell is this about?
After having a left-wing behavioral scientist study the video of Piper grooming Trig during Palin’s speech, the NYT is going to report with 100% assurance that IT’S PIPER’S BABY!!
These people are beyond deranged. They are like a cult.
I worry we are going to see several Chistine Chubbuck moments in the MSM before it is all said and done.
I don’t see what they’re going to report on. Either they are going to say it’s Bristol’s or the baby isn’t Todd’s.
Yea, Piss off more people....
I’d say whatever it is, they have planted plenty of evidence.
Could Evil Sith Lord Karl Rove be behind this, pulling strings from the shadows?... if so, Rove, you magnificent bastard, you’ve done it again!
Does it mean that NYT is preparing to put an exposé on the front page?
The weird turn of phase together with the insanity this topic makes me think it's just Drudge putting up a nonsense "developing" story up to generate hits
The Dems of late seem smug, too smug.
Funny you mention this. My expecting wife and I just completed a class on birthing and we learned that it can be quite a bit of time between water breaking and actual delivery. If the doctor is fine with it, then there is no big deal at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.