Conclusion - Opinion: “Forest [Fire] Jihad” pointing specifically to Australia is new.
#
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022578.php
(THE AGE)
September 6, 2008
“Islamic group urges forest fire jihad”
#
http://www.theage.com.au/national/islam-group-urges-forest-fire-jihad-20080906-4b53.html
“Islam group urges forest fire jihad”
Josh Gordon
September 7, 2008
Page 1 of 2 |
#
http://www.historyofjihad.org/australia.html
“History of the Jihad against Australia (2001 - Ongoing)”
#
Previously...taxi jihad:
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24031612-952,00.html
“Muslim taxi drivers refuse blind fares with ‘unclean’ guide dogs”
Hannah Davies
July 17, 2008 12:00am
Note: The following post is a quote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2076323/posts
Are we mad? Every organ of the state now seems intent on protecting those who would destroy us
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 03rd September 2008 | Ruth Dudley Edwards
Posted on September 6, 2008 3:26:26 PM PDT by Mount Athos
Abu Qatada, wanted by Jordan for involvement in terrorist attacks, strolls down a London street, carrying groceries paid for by the British taxpayer.
Beside him, on a mobile phone, apparently acting as a go-between, is Yasser Al-Sirri, wanted by Egypt for aiding an assassination attempt in 1993 of the then Prime Minister with a car bomb, which instead killed a young girl.
Both these men despise the country that is sheltering them. [...]
Supported by state benefits, Qatada began preaching in local mosques his blood-thirsty anti-Jewish and anti-Christian messages and calling for Muslims to kill non-Muslims.
Because of a toxic mixture of political correctness and ignorance that seems to pervade all our dealings with Muslim extremists, the police were ignoring the rants of even the most incendiary preachers, so Qatada spread his poison undisturbed. [...]
The system does not just allow people in who hate the country, but it subsidises them, turns a blind eye to their activities until forced to act, foots the bill for lawyers to find loopholes in laws that were designed to keep the public safe, and has judges who take such lofty absolutist positions that it is almost impossible to deport even the vilest of the vile.
If Islamic terrorists and their supporters were looking for a safe haven during the so-called ‘war against terror’, why on earth would they bother with some dusty cave in Afghanistan, a squalid street in Iran or a dangerous suburb of Baghdad?
Britain is far more comfortable and generous towards them. And - even more attractive - they run no risk. They are allowed to carry on with their plans for our destruction unfettered by the rule of law or fears of justice.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...