Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2008 12:03:15 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: xzins

You know xzins, you really don’t want to play this card.


2 posted on 09/01/2008 12:05:14 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (McCain-Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
But did Stanley-Ann and her bigamist husband travel to a foreign land (maybe for a census), have ‘lil Barry in a humble crib, then come back to Hawaii to celebrate the burf?
4 posted on 09/01/2008 12:09:02 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I’m not sure this belongs in breaking news.

:)


5 posted on 09/01/2008 12:09:52 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Forget Errol Flynn.... I'm in like McCain/Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I know FR has been slow lately, but this Breaking?!


6 posted on 09/01/2008 12:09:57 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; Admin Moderator
There's a lot of ways to handle this without going down this road, xzins.
10 posted on 09/01/2008 12:12:00 PM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Because she was a good Jew.


19 posted on 09/01/2008 1:22:03 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Mary was not unwed. She was married to Joseph.

Now, she was a virgin, yes, but not unwed.


21 posted on 09/01/2008 1:29:06 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 ("An American Carol", due October 3rd in theaters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

oh please; dont make idiotic comments like this.


24 posted on 09/01/2008 1:37:14 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Uh, most people don’t know that under Jewish law, Joseph and Mary were allowed conjugal visits during their engagement.

This is why there was no community uproar over Mary’s pregnancy.

The only uproar was with Joseph himself, who knew he had not slept with Mary.
Thus, God had to tell him what was up.

In a strict sense, Mary was not “unwed”. Her pregnancy was not a sin. God never even “gives the appearance of evil” when He works.

Again, under Jewish law, Joseph and Mary were not living together until they officially had the ceremony, but were allowed conjugal visits as they were betrothed.

Otherwise, the Old Testament laws would have condemned her for fornication or adultery and she would have been stoned.

This is also why Joseph was contemplating quietly “putting her away” or divorcing her — he knew he had not slept with her until the Lord made clear to him what happened.


28 posted on 09/01/2008 2:23:49 PM PDT by IreneE (Live for nothing or die for something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Bump.


36 posted on 09/01/2008 3:30:38 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The only problem with this is that Mary was married to Joseph. Not an insignificant difference between the two.

Please do not deify a political candidate.


37 posted on 09/01/2008 3:31:41 PM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Mary was not ‘just another unwed pregnant teen’ as some have referred to her as. Rather in the marriage arrangement under Jewish custom she was already legally the wife of Joseph which is why he thought of a quiet divorce. Our Lord did not come into this world under a cloud of scandal for an unmarried pregnant woman could even be subject to stoning.


48 posted on 09/01/2008 6:36:49 PM PDT by magdalen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

LOL, Chaplain.

It reminds me of Reagan’s line that “everyone who’s pro-abortion has already been born.”


61 posted on 09/02/2008 6:29:32 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Mary was not quite “unwed” at the time of the Conception. She was “betrothed” which then and in many cultures now is the first formal part of being wed and babies conceived during the betrothal period are just as “legitimate” as babies conceived after the final ceremony. Betrothal is/was, in fact, just as hard to get out of as Marriage proper and requires “divorce.”


83 posted on 09/02/2008 8:53:23 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson