First you try to paint Palin supporters as Messiah worshippers, then you say you’re just waiting on the facts? You didn’t wait on the facts. You blew it.
You still try to say we ‘genuflect’, that we ‘erect shrines’.
But no, you’re just ‘waiting on the facts’.
Here’s the difference: I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. If I’m wrong later, then I’m wrong. [Shurg.] At least I wasn’t pre-judging her. You, on the other hand, want to be sour grapes. If you’re wrong later, what then?
One thing I learned the hard way in this forum: people should think long and hard before they pee in someone’s cheerios. That’s what leftists did when they “Borked” Clarence Thomas.
You’ve got it backwards. I’m reserving judgement on the lady and her politics until I get facts. Her 2 years as governor does not show her stances on national issues.
And you are acting like she’s the ‘chosen one’ because you don’t seem to care one whit about her unknown politics. Nor the problem in her family life. Ignoring those things means you are desperate for a candidate you can back, regardless of who they are. That’s dangerous.
If you like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, are you also giving Obama that? Maybe he’ll change once in office too, like many are hoping McAmnesty will.