To: Free ThinkerNY
I’ve been thinking about this. Suppose it’s true that the baby belongs to her 16-yr-old daughter. That would mean that the Mom protected her daughter. No harm. The whole family is going to raise the baby.
There is no story here . . . even if it’s true. It would just make me like her more!
Go McCain/Palin!!
7 posted on
08/31/2008 11:44:16 AM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Saundra Duffy
Hey Saundra. I agree with you completely!
susie
34 posted on
08/31/2008 12:07:45 PM PDT by
brytlea
(CHANGE! --all we'll have left in our pockets if Obama is elected.)
To: Saundra Duffy
That would mean that the Mom protected her daughter. And lied to the rest of us, dragging in a goodly number of people into the conspiracy. Maybe that's something that would occur in an inner city tenement, or a rural trailer park, but I give Sarah far more credit than to try to pull a stunt like that.
46 posted on
08/31/2008 12:36:56 PM PDT by
hunter112
(John McCain might just have made a decision that has earned him my vote with Sarah Palin.)
To: Saundra Duffy
52 posted on
08/31/2008 1:13:36 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: Saundra Duffy
I’ve been thinking about this. Suppose it’s true that the baby belongs to her 16-yr-old daughter. That would mean that the Mom protected her daughter. No harm. The whole family is going to raise the baby. There is no story here . . . even if it’s true. It would just make me like her more!I'm with you. That would be showing a mother's unconditional love, which mothers understand, and since so many lefties don't have their babies but choose to kill them, they can't understand.
60 posted on
08/31/2008 2:14:39 PM PDT by
bamagirl1944
(That's short for Alabama, not Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson