If we ever give university degrees in liberal BS analysis this would be a good case study. I know nothing about the history of this and can tell they are dancing around this trying to make it sound like Palin supported a windfall profits tax when probably was tax increase that resulted in a ‘windfall’ for the state.
Question is whether this was in increase in corporate net income, and if so from what level to what level and compare that with some other states. If it was really a windfall profits tax (e.g. something time limited or triggered at some level etc.) then it is poorly written.
LOL, what else from an Ivy League?