[Kevmo]

Good post. The only thing I can see that directly relates the good doctor to image analysis is the phrase, “specializes in non-classical computer forensics”. I’ve met a few PhD’s who abusively lord it over others when in reality their PhD was a specialty in an unrelated area and they had no basis for being so dismissive. Keep up the good work.

One of the strong points of your current argument is that no one can produce these “scanning artifacts” that seem so critical to their case. Perhaps you could introduce what that might actually look like on a BC scan. Visuals always work better than words.

[Polarik]

One of the strong points of your current argument is that no one can produce these “scanning artifacts” that seem so critical to their case. Perhaps you could introduce what that might actually look like on a BC scan. Visuals always work better than words.

I'm good, but I'd have to be capable of performing miracles to find what is simply not there. "Scanner artifacts" bear absolutely no relationship to the pixel patterns I discovered and documented, and you can take that to the bank.

BUT, you ain't seen nothin' yet. I will receive a genuine, original paper COLB in a few days, and the tests that I will subject to it will knock everything else right out of the park. Bye-bye FactCheck scan image, Bye-bye FactCheck photos. Hasta Lavista,Obama COLB.

[Polarik]

Good post. The only thing I can see that directly relates the good doctor to image analysis is the phrase, “specializes in non-classical computer forensics”. I’ve met a few PhD’s who abusively lord it over others when in reality their PhD was a specialty in an unrelated area and they had no basis for being so dismissive. Keep up the good work.

One of the strong points of your current argument is that no one can produce these “scanning artifacts” that seem so critical to their case. Perhaps you could introduce what that might actually look like on a BC scan. Visuals always work better than words.

Thanks, Kevmo. When I first made that observation on June 13, I never thought that it would become the linchpin of my analyses. If you type, "image analysis" AND "non-classical computer forensics” into Google, you will get those same five listings I mentioned, of which two of the five are to Dr. K's blog.

[Polarik]

I’ve tried to reproduce those requisite ‘Scanner artifacts,” but gave up trying after image number 117.