Unfortunately, none of what you just wrote in that post makes much sense to 95% of readers. The prize goes to the guy who can bring that kind of material down to bite-size chunks that normal people can understand. Just a hint, for when you write that book of yours... ;-)
And I get criticized by Neal Krawetz for NOT using relevant technical language.
I absolutely can make it understandable to the masses. I plan on doing just that, once all of my analyses have been completed.
It's hard enough to get the information posted to the Net in the form it is now, but it requires twice as much work to rewrite all of it into terms that anyone can understand.
Do I have any volunteers to help me write the "Image Forgery for Newbies" handbook?