[GourmetDan]

"Ok then, you seem to go from electromagnetism, to gravity, to tides, back to gravity. No answer as to how the force would move the massive Sun while leaving the tiny Earth motionless in violation of Force = mass *acceleration."

Just answering questions. There's no getting around the fact that geocentrism is equivalent to geokineticism under GR per Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis. To claim that there is some physically significant difference is to reject GR because GR says there is none. If it doesn't make sense it's because you don't understand.

"Claiming I don't understand what you are obviously not saying while claiming you are seems your only tactic, and it is a rather shoddy one, but in keeping with the general intellectual and honesty level of your posts."

Claiming that I have not answered your questions seems your only tactic, and it is a rather shoddy one, but in keeping with the general intellectual and honesty level of your posts.

[Jack of all Trades]

Why not just answer “The Firmament”, and be done with it? You know, The Firmament, that shell of matter of near infinite density into which the Sun, Moon, and stars are embedded. The one that rotates around the Earth once every day. The Firmament, aka Heaven. That is the correct answer per the geocentric view, no?

[allmendream]

Please reference the specific posts wherein you answered my rather simple questions.

“I've already answered” is a common tactic of those who have not answered and are embarrassed to.

What force could drag the Sun around the Earth? Talking about coordinate systems and general relativity and the tides doesn't answer this question, it avoids it.

What in the Bible supports Geocentricism?