[Ron Jeremy]

There is no shortage of artwork from prehistoric times showing clearly recognizable dinosaur types and that includes Ica stones, Amerind petroglyphs and other categories of things, and there might have been a handfull of dinosaur holdouts after the flood... But the basic reality is that dinosaurs lived before the flood and the pyramids were built after it.

We draw dinosaurs now, yet we don't live with them. If 5,000 years from now people see our movies with dinosaurs, should they use that at proof that we lived with them?

[ApplegateRanch]

If 5,000 years from now people see our movies with dinosaurs, should they use that at proof that we lived with them?

In the persona of Eric Van Danigan's umpteenth great grandson...

Never heard of "documentaries"?

Next you'll deny that Godzilla didn't destroy Tokyo!

And that Gamera retracted his head & legs into his shell, spouted flames, and flew to Mars.

You think Mothman or Spider Man or Tommyknockers aren't real, either?

I've seen the ruins of the cities of the ancients, and nothing else can explain...

[Gordon Greene]

No matter how many times you restate this, it doesn’t appear to be logical.

We draw them because we have seen the historical representations and because we have the fossil record. In the times when the original cave drawings and the like were done, there were no fossil records to speak of because they didn’t possess the technology to reconstruct the bones.

We are not at the beginning of this discovery but somewhere way down the road, so everything we do is from historical evidence and hearsay. Everything they did had to be from first-hand perspective if it was to be in any way accurate.

Nice try, though.