Posted on 08/22/2008 9:51:22 AM PDT by Diamond
I did post a section of one of the documents though.
Forbes.com staff, 10.01.02, 5:29 PM ET
NEW YORK - Philanthropist Walter H. Annenberg, who ranked No. 34 on the 2002 Forbes Richest Americans list, died today at his home in Pennsylvania after a brief bout with pneumonia. He was 94.
Walter Annenberg
The University of Pennsylvania dropout inherited debt-ridden Triangle Publications from his father in 1942, when he was just 32. As the only son among Moses Annenberg's eight children, he managed to turn around Triangle, the moribund publisher of The Philadelphia Inquirer and Daily Racing Form, positioning it for a dynamic period of growth and expanding the business with the addition of wildly successful magazines such as Seventeen and TV Guide. He sold the Inquirer to Knight-Ridder (nyse: KRI - news - people ) in 1970 and then the rest of the company to Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (nyse: NWS - news - people ) for $3 billion in 1988.
Annenberg, whose estate is estimated at $4 billion, was a close friend and political ally of several presidents, beginning with Dwight Eisenhower and extending to Ronald Reagan. Nancy Reagan described him as one of former President Reagan's "closest friends for half a century." Richard Nixon appointed him ambassador to Britain in 1969, a position that he held for five and a half years.
Topping the list of his extensive philanthropic work are the endowment of journalism schools at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Southern California, and the donation of a highly prized collection of modern art worth more than $1 billion to New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art. Annenberg was also a benefactor to the United Negro College Fund, the state of Israel and numerous hospitals and schools.
I sent that link to Drudge and Fox News as well.
We’ll see if they pick up the story...
Why is Rush not talking about this?
Because it’s distracting nonsense.”
Rush will talk about it when the court makes a ruling.
OK: "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
You cannot hold dual citizenship and run for President
Who says so? You?
If you renounce your citizenship and then run for office you must declare this when announcing your candidacy, if not you are guilty of fraud and you are disqualified.
Again, who says so? You?
you must supply me with the statute that says you can have dual citizenship and run for President.
You are right, there is no such statute. There is also no statute which says if you like blue shirts you are eligible. Nor is there a statute that says men who eat eggs are eligible. What does that have to do with anything?
There are three, and only three, requirements in the Constitution to SERVE as President. They are:
1) Natural-born citizen
2) 35 years of age
3) 14 years a resident of the US.
There are no statutory requirements, and if there were, they would be unconstitutional.
There are no Constitutional requirements to RUN for President because the Constitution does not recognize such a thing as "running for President". The only people who are running for anything on November 4, 2008 are the hundreds and hundreds of candidates for Elector for President and Vice President of the United States.
This could backfire...Hillary may be harder to beat.”
Maybe—maybe not.
She is poised to stiff about $11 million worth of vendor bills.
Do you wnat to be a venfor who puts her general election campaign expenditures on your accounts recievable? I don’t.
Couldn't tell you.
Cordially,
All unconstitutional, without a doubt.
This is what the Congress is permitted to do regarding OUR selection of OUR President: "The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States."
That's it. Any other Federal "law" having to do with the process of choosing Electors is facially unconstitutional.
And until Joe Blow casts his vote for an ineligible person, no legal or Constitional issue arises.”
Joe Blow citizen has already cast his votes for Nobama in the primary. IMO, this is the violation, along with the DNC putting him up as a viable candidate when they never checked.
This whole primary would have then been a big fraud, with millions of dollars pumping up the economy.
Nobama would not have been eligible to run in the first place. No wonder he’s acting so snarky. He has gotten this far on a forged birth certificate.
Karl Rove, you magnificent Bas_ _ _ _ .!!!!!
Better question: Where’s the “facts” and evidence that this occurred. As with most (all) of the complaint, it’s based on the rumors put forth primarily by NoQuarterUSA and TexasDarlin’s websites.
I think this is a red herring and will backfire — by making ANY questions/challenges to Obama’s brackground suspect.
Source please? He is NOT Hillary’s lawyer. He’s a 9/11 Truther who sued Bush & Cheney, alleging they conspired to have 9/11 happen.
I doubt it will go anywhere, but I think Hillary is trying to make sure Obama is defeated so that she can come back and run in 2012.
I’m sure someone will post it publicly before long.
MM
I assume you mean, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Says nothing about dual citizenship OR divided loyalty.
Nothing.
Zero, zip, zilch, nada.
Perhaps you are seeing penumbras and emanations?
Neither the DNC, nor the RNC, nor any of their works and ways, have any constitutional standing.
From the point of view of Article II and Amendment XII, these proceedings are meaningless.
AMEN!!
Actually, it was in New Hampshire, I believe - and was dismissed late last month by the court on the ground that citizens do not have standing to challenge the qualifications to be president - only a challenger would have standing. See http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/McCain-Judgment-7-25-08.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.