Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
No, they're not. If they break the law they are wrong. Statutory rape is immoral as recognized by all normal people and it is illegal. Very few would defend it and even fewer would consider that condemning rape or law breaking is religious persecution.

Your lumping them all together constitutes persecution. If you claim that Jeffs broke the law and is immoral you would be correct. But when you say that the FLDS are immoral and misguided you are incorrect, unless you can prove that every man women and child of the FLDS is immoral and incorrect.

Using your definition of persecute "to annoy with persistent or urgent attacks" you are persecuting the FLDS. Assuming that any FLDS read any of these threads of course : )

121 posted on 08/22/2008 5:04:22 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande

If they read these threads of their own free will, that’s not me persecuting them.

Wrong is wrong and saying so is not persecution; it’s stating the facts.

If they don’t like it, too bad. They can portray themselves as martyrs all they like, but nobody is going to buy their whiny pity party that someone said something they didn’t like; well, almost nobody....


123 posted on 08/22/2008 5:07:48 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson