Posted on 08/13/2008 3:51:47 PM PDT by goldstategop
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
“stupid women” = Edward’s base!
LOL!
I was wondering when we were going to hear from Ann. :-). Knew it would be good.
Just another Monica Lewinski. She threw herself at him and there was just nothing he could do to resist. The pull of her was just much stronger than him wanting to be President. I think the character of the man is pretty clear.
The funny part about the DNA thing is that any snoopy reporter can just find a sippy cup used by the child, then compare it with Edwards DNA, left behind on one of his sippy cups.
Even funnier, they can *say* they did it, without having actually done it.
The only way to prove that the child *isn’t* Edwards’, is a DNA test.
Haw haw.
They do that stuff on CSI all the time!
While admitting the affair, Edwards denied he fathered the woman’s child. “We only had ‘unconventional’ sex, so there’s no way I could be the father of that baby,” he insisted.
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
Ping to read later
I do not believe Ann Coulter likes John Edwards very much.
In no small part because Edwards, who claims to represent the enlightened branch of the Democrat party harking back to the days of Camelot, does not have the moxey of a Kennedy, who would have had the woman killed.
Not just a sleazebag, but a wuss as well.
If it’s wendesday night it must be time for an Ann Coulter column.
And he calls himself a rat? Where was he the day that Clinton covered this in class.
It wasn't sex!
Ouch! Ouch! Ouch!
Zing!
Edwards is the perfect example of “white trash”.
Ann’s just mad that it was a woman.
Apparently, the aura of his chakras clued her in he was the Second Coming of Gandhi. In other words, he had a mystical boner in the bar when they met, the karmic sign of "old souls" destined for "transformative" leadership in the Age of Aquarius. Only problem, he'll have to wait until the next Age of Aquarius. Roughly, 26,000 years.
.jpg)
Meanwhile, they will have to forward the channelled messages and advice from the Great Gazoo to Obama.
It is becoming a strange part of police procedure, since there is little case law so far.
For example, a recent case was of police trolling a cafe, taking pictures of a suspect with a plastic drinking cup, then collecting the cup to get his DNA. They found DNA that matched “wanted” DNA, and had a photo of the suspect using the cup. So they arrested him.
This was done because when the police had pulled in that suspect, his lawyer told him to not drink or eat anything the police gave him, so they could not obtain DNA from any implement he used. So they began to track the suspects activities, hoping to get a sample from discarded garbage.
Police have long been able to root through your trash, once you put it out on the curb. And though this can’t be used to associate DNA with you in particular, it is again probable cause to search your premises and you.
There is such an absence of law that even private companies are now providing similar services. For example, if a man suspects that a woman’s child might be his, they can obtain a sample of the child’s DNA from trash, and discreetly let him know. This is if he is concerned that he might be accused of being the child’s father. Only he will know for sure. If he is, he might just decide to pick up and move somewhere else without warning. It’s hard to make paternity stick without getting some of his DNA, several States away.
But the real zinger is that the data points used for DNA might be unacceptably flawed. Typically in court, the number is bandied about that a false DNA match has odds “13 Billion to one against”.
However, a recent survey of just the Arizona prison system started by finding a DNA match in two unrelated prisoners, one white and the other black. Subsequent tests showed over a dozen DNA matches just in that prison system alone.
This means that DNA identification may be useless. Importantly, this could ruin tens of thousands of criminal cases in the US alone.
Dang. I love Ann.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.