Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
You have to dismiss the “very good” description of creation in order for the “God used evolution” assertion.

And you would also have to assume that God is not omniscient to conclude that "very good" was intended to apply only to the pre-fall creation. (Indeed, one of the conundrums of Genesis is its depiction of a contrarian and oddly limited God, who was, for example, unaware of the location of Adam and Eve after they succumbed to the temptation that He had orchestrated for them.)

772 posted on 08/20/2008 1:12:15 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies ]


To: atlaw
And you would also have to assume that God is not omniscient to conclude that "very good" was intended to apply only to the pre-fall creation.

No such "have to"...

God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. It WAS very good, pre-fall. Man had free will, but he WAS still good, with the potential to choose sin. This potential is not a flaw. If it wasn't there, we'd be automotons.

The alternative? Just toss the basis of all Christian religion, and that is the whole goal anyway, isn't it?

773 posted on 08/20/2008 1:23:16 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson