Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thoughts? (I should explain that Lex is a newly retired naval aviator and I know little about aviation)
1 posted on 08/11/2008 10:01:29 PM PDT by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dawnsblood

We would have to have their permission to launch an attack from Turkey.

Russia knows this.


2 posted on 08/11/2008 10:04:10 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood
I checked out a thread at DU yesterday about Cheney condemning Russia. Between the expletives, the basic pattern was that the US only cared because of oil and that the whole conflict started because Bush wanted an excuse to either go into Iran or start WWIII.

So.. politically, we are shackled. I think Bush should just say F*U* stupid libs, you already think I'm, Satan, so here's some more fodder for your hysteria. But he won't.

4 posted on 08/11/2008 10:07:30 PM PDT by douginthearmy (Obamaniacs suffering from "inevitability complex" go cold turkey Nov'08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

“The US defense official said about 8,000 to 10,000 Russian troops have moved into South Ossetia. They also have flown SU-25, SU-24, SU-27 and TU-22 fighters and bombers during the campaign.”

Su-25,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-25
“The first prototype made its maiden flight on 22 February 1975. After testing, the aircraft went into series production in 1978”

SU-24,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Su-24
“was the Soviet Union’s most advanced all-weather interdiction and attack aircraft in the 1970s and 1980s”

SU-27,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Su-27
“The production Su-27 (sometimes Su-27S, NATO designation ‘Flanker-B’) began to enter VVS operational service around 1984, although manufacturing difficulties kept it from appearing in strength until 1986”

TT-22,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu-22#See_also
“The first serial-production Tu-22B bomber, built at Kazan Factory No. 22, flew on 22 September 1960,”

SU-30,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-30
“developed by Russia’s Sukhoi Aviation Corporation and introduced into operational service in 1996.”

Yeah, and Israel showed us something else works in Syria not long ago. I say we can, and should do it. The F22, America’s gift to freedom.


5 posted on 08/11/2008 10:08:23 PM PDT by enduserindy (Just say NO to the curtain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood
Not sure if we can get help from Turkey on this. They may not want to get involved.

As an aside when I was a nugget I remember Lex spending an extra hour one night helping me understand a tactical concept, even though I wasn't in his squadron. A very good dude.

6 posted on 08/11/2008 10:15:39 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

All our fighter aircraft could play havoc and obtain air superiority but without boots and mechanized equipment to hold the territory it would be wasted. The 8,000 mile logistics line is not possible with the military we have today and the fight being essentially in Russia’s back yard.


7 posted on 08/11/2008 10:15:53 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood; FARS; BIGLOOK; Grampa Dave; Jeff Head; potlatch; devolve; gonzo; MeekOneGOP; ...
FARS, what's up with Turkey; would the Islamists like to settle a score with Russia.

Russia's chickens comin' home t'roost.

10 posted on 08/11/2008 10:20:54 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood
The quicker you pull the trigger on these SOBs the better!
13 posted on 08/11/2008 10:28:38 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

Probably don’t need a “no fly zone” as much as a “no tankski zone.”


15 posted on 08/11/2008 10:30:51 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

In the unlikely event I was advising President Bush, I would suggest he immediately appoint a personal representative, with no official position, but with sufficient reputation and gravitas to demand attention. Someone like say, Newt Gingrich. Have him fly to Moscow immediately aboard Air Force One, announce that he will be there exactly four hours and demand to speak personally to Putin. Tell him face to face that as of a certain hour the next day American planes will begin flying Combat Air Patrol over Georgia. If Russian planes encroach into the airspace of Georgia proper (outside of the disputed provinces), they will be shot down. If Russian ground units move into other parts of Georgia they will be attacked from the air. As Frank Gaffney said today, we need ot “draw a line in the air”, or we lose all credibility, and the security of eastern Europe is done for.


17 posted on 08/11/2008 10:34:02 PM PDT by Hugin (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood
I spent time in the military during the latter part of Viet Nam fiasco.

So my military experience is sort of dated on current matters.

Would someone be so kind as to take some time and clue me in on what the USA could really do and if we did that what would be the consequences of those actions?

Is Putin crazy enough to start a nuclear war if we whipped his butt with conventional weapons in Georgia?

21 posted on 08/11/2008 10:42:35 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (OBAMA aka Post Turtle the Forest Gump of American Politics ABORTION -Liberal Child Abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

My fellow Americans, I am pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation which outlaws Russia forever. The bombing begins in five minutes. - Reagan


24 posted on 08/11/2008 11:05:51 PM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

We aren’t going to attack Russians now anymore than we did in Afghanistan. It would be a proxy war.


25 posted on 08/11/2008 11:22:04 PM PDT by Soliton (> 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

Can’t do a thing with the F-22. It’s to advanced to loose one over russia or china controlled area - that’s also why they can’t earn money through export.

There are also far to few to replace F-15s to protect the US in a big war.


29 posted on 08/12/2008 1:44:27 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dawnsblood

Lots of other countries have purchased M1s. Why not “lend” some to Georgia? Perhaps a Patriot missile battery or two to protect Tiblisi?


31 posted on 08/12/2008 5:43:12 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson