Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: David
I was with your comments, until about halfway through. Then, I think you went off the rails.

When a candidate signs the certification for his/her Electoral College delegates, that is an official act which has a factual consequence. As a result, the appropriate number of Electors will become official candidates on the ballot in each jurisdiction. (Under state laws, when you vote for “Smith” for President, you are actually voting for the Electors for Smith for President.)

So, contrary to your conclusion, the issue is ripe for adjudication. The case does NOT have to wait until a candidate wins the election before a decision can be reached.

As for your reference to Bush v. Gore, I wrote one of the 14 briefs in that case. There are no issues common to that case and the present issue.

John / Billybob

450 posted on 08/07/2008 9:13:52 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Why do taglines sometimes just disappear? www.theacru.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

The case does NOT have to wait until a candidate wins the election before a decision can be reached.
***But... can we time it so that it gets decided in October? ;-)


451 posted on 08/07/2008 1:48:55 PM PDT by Kevmo (A person's a person, no matter how small. ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson