Skip to comments.
Shocker: Obama's "birth certificate" forged with sister Maya's original
Israeli Insider ^
| 8/5/08
| staff
Posted on 08/05/2008 7:20:42 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-494 last
To: pissant
Cannon had some valid complaints, to which I privately concurred.
However, when he stepped into the “I don’t doubt that the Kos COLB image is genuine,” I had to step in and challenged him on it.
481
posted on
08/10/2008 8:54:01 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: Polarik
I’ve read a fair amount by Cannon. He flaps his gums a little too loosely for me to take him seriously.
482
posted on
08/10/2008 8:57:51 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Israeli Insider has now run with it.. Israeli Insider is a great tertiary news source.
483
posted on
08/10/2008 8:58:00 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: Polarik
Publicity is key. We both know it is a forgery. Others’ speculating and reporting that it is a forgery, regardless of the precision of their particular technical analysis (or lack thereof) is welcome.
484
posted on
08/10/2008 9:00:51 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Publicity is key. We both know it is a forgery. Others speculating and reporting that it is a forgery, regardless of the precision of their particular technical analysis (or lack thereof) is welcome.
I agree that publicity is needed, but the problems are that (1) faulty research is being publicized, and (2) much more is required than the precision of one's analysis.
The difficulty to replicate his work is one factor that casts a dark shadow on his results, as are the facts that run counter to his theory.
The reason why replication and validation are critical here, is because if any part of his work is disproved, then the entire process for finding forgeries is permanently damaged.
This is a case of one bad apple spoiling the whole bunch.
485
posted on
08/10/2008 9:20:43 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: Polarik
I do not agree that the barrel is spoiled. Techdude has some good analysis along with his not so good analysis. It certainly is not helpful to claim to find Maya’s name there if no one else can replicate it, but if Techdude’s continued analysis helps publicize the fact that it is a forgery, then good.
Similar to the NE and Edwards. Even if the ‘lovechild’ is not Silky’s, the fact is the Enquirer KNEW they were having an affair, and the term lovechild, accurate or not, helped publicize the story. So they may have got some of the details wrong, they still nailed him.
I assumed the COLB was a fake even before your analysis proved it based on two things: The crappy way the border misaligned, and the fact that it did not look like any scanned document I’ve ever seen, rather it looked like it was created via computer. That would not be possible since the DOH does not email such documents and would therefore have had to be a scanned jpeg, which it wasn’t.
486
posted on
08/10/2008 9:34:13 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Ive read a fair amount by Cannon. He flaps his gums a little too loosely for me to take him seriously.
I called him out. br>
I bet him a month's salary that he could not prove that the Kos image is genuine. br>
Never heard back from him.
487
posted on
08/10/2008 9:55:04 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: pissant
I do not agree that the barrel is spoiled
Well, that's true. According to the apple, he's the only one in the barrel.
488
posted on
08/10/2008 10:06:51 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: Kevmo
Thanks for your hard work, pissant & polarik.
This article has been posted over at the Intrade forum. https://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/75/2279.page
Thank you for the acknowledgment. I believe that credit should be given where credit is due. Not everyone shares this view, however.
489
posted on
08/10/2008 10:11:41 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: pissant
It is way past time for the National Enquirer to jump on this story. The MSM is not going to do it for obvious reasons. Because they are enjoying a peak in credibility due to their recent revelations of the Edwards Love Child Affair they are the obvious choice to break this story.
Surely we have amongst the many enterprising Freepers just one who has a contact at National Enquirer. If so, it is time to make that phone call or send that e-mail.
Do it.
To: bvw
o: HundredDollars; Polarik; expatguy; SE Mom Actually a group of Pajama Warriors have been tracking out Obama's birth legend and citizenships and religions and other basic loyalty-related issues for months. Before the forged CoLB was released, there were Dr. Corsi and expatguy looking into it, with the release of the forgery Polarik steadfastly and persistently investigated it and found the text had been modified. Since the start of July a whole bunch of freepers have been on the case -- see The Long Thread.
Techdude first launched his investigation on AtlasShrugs, a conservative site run by Pam Geller.
Thank you for the recognition. That's all I ever asked of those who have worked with me, or have used my work.
491
posted on
08/10/2008 10:14:56 AM PDT
by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
To: Polarik
492
posted on
08/10/2008 11:11:29 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Polarik
Honestly, I had originally thought the whole CoLB thing was a tempest in a teapot. That Obama was born to an American mom, therefore he was “natural born” — and that was after skimming over Blackstone on that term. Your perseverance along with others on the forgery and all the information sharing and discussions all we all have had here and on other forums have really helped me understand the issue, to settle out the specks of gold in the wash pan.
493
posted on
08/10/2008 11:26:06 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: autumnraine
But were you there during Muhammad Zias rule? I was there while Zia was president. My dad was there working for USAID off and on in the 80's.
There was actually a major American presence in Pakistan at that time - the US extended a bunch of aid to Pakistan in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1980.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-494 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson