Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
What do we know, beyond any doubt, about sinclair?

We know, beyond any doubt, that sinclair is a convicted felon, a career criminal, a career conman, a liar, a drug dealer, a promiscuous queer (in his own words sinclair - "has engaged in intimate (gay) sexual relations with individuals of African-American, Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican, Iranian, Saudi Arabian, heritage"), convicted of identity theft, a habitual drug user, a fugitive from justice, a check kiter...

What is his story?

In 1999 a limo driver/pimp took a total stranger (sinclair) to a club where he introduced him to a well-known public figure (obama) and that the well-known public figure (obama) offered to take the total stranger (sinclair) on a late night drive to buy drugs and the the well-known public figure (obama)and the total stranger (sinclair) got it on in the back of a limo. AND, that the well-known public figure (obama) liked the total stranger (sinclair) so much that he went back for more.

What actual evidence has sinclair promised to support his accusations?

Tons.

What actual evidence has sinclair provided?

None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Why does the conman now upgrade his accusations and state, as he did in a thread posted here three days ago, that obama was in fact the gay lover of the murdered church member?

Because that is what conmen do - especially when the con is getting cold.

What is the benefit to the conman in pushing his allegations?

Whatever six figure payment the Enquirer shells out these days.

What does any conman need to keep his con alive?

A chump, mark, sucker, dupe.

Do we want the Free Republic to be sinclair's chump, mark, sucker, dupe?

I don't.

What is the upside to Free Republic being the central clearing house for sinclair?

There is none.

What is the down side?

It gives the MSM a legitimate reason to paint this forum as genuinely a kook-fringe site, thereby stripping the Free Republic of any legitimacy on any subject.

158 posted on 08/04/2008 6:52:46 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

Don’t waste your time regaling Kristinn with logic or sense, he’s busy whipping up the “troops” with tabloid headlines and sensationalistic warnings of “danger”.

Anybody, and I mean anybody who gives this idiot Sinclair one iota of legitimacy is a complete moron and fool. To do it on Free Republic shows a lack of respect for the site and for Jim Robinson.

And don’t worry about FR having any legitimacy. 25% of the posters make sure that will never happen.


169 posted on 08/04/2008 10:49:13 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911
It gives the MSM a legitimate reason to paint this forum as genuinely a kook-fringe site, thereby stripping the Free Republic of any legitimacy on any subject.

I agree with that statement. We are being used and I don't like it one bit.

171 posted on 08/04/2008 3:19:41 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson