Mitt Romney Ping!
Freepmail me if you'd like on or off this list!
Before RomneyCare was enacted, estimates of the number of uninsured in Massachusetts ranged from 372,000 to 618,000. Under the new program, about 219,000 previously uninsured residents have signed up for insurance. Of these, 133,000 are receiving subsidized coverage, proving once again that people are all too happy to accept something "for free," and let others pay the bill. That is in addition to 56,000 people who have been signed up for Medicaid. The bigger the subsidy, the faster people are signing up. Of the 133,000 people who have signed up for insurance since the plan was implemented, slightly more than half have received totally free coverage. It’s important to note that the subsidies in Massachusetts are extensive and reach well into the middle class-available on a sliding scale to those with incomes up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level. That means subsidies would be available for those with incomes ranging from $30,480 for a single individual to as much as $130,389 for a married couple with seven children. A typical married couple with two children would qualify for a subsidy if their income were below $63,000.\What we don’t know is how many of those receiving subsidized insurance were truly uninsured and how many had insurance that either they or their employer was paying for. Studies indicate that substitution of taxpayer-financed for privately funded insurance is a common occurrence with other government programs such as Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP). Massachusetts has attempted to limit this "crowdout" effect by requiring that individuals be uninsured for at least six months before qualifying for subsidies. Still some substitution is likely to have occurred.
The subsidies may have increased the number of Massachusetts citizens with insurance, but as many as 400,000 Massachusetts residents by some estimates have failed to buy the required insurance. That includes the overwhelming majority of those with incomes too high to qualify for state subsidies. Fewer than 30,000 unsubsidized residents have signed up as a result of the mandate. And that is on top of the 60,000 of the state’s uninsured who were exempted from the mandate because buying insurance would be too much of a financial burden.
As does the Wall Street Journal: The Price of RomneyCare.
Mr. Patrick had already bumped up this year's spending to $869 million, $144 million over its original estimate. Liberals duly noted that these tax hikes are necessary because enrollment in Commonwealth Care is much higher than anticipated. But of course more people will have coverage if government gives it to them for free. The problem is that someone has to pay for it.Thus the extra tab of $129 million, which may need to go higher because it relies on uncertain federal funds from Medicaid. For now, Mr. Patrick wants one-time (yeah, right) charges of $33 million on insurers and $28 million on providers, plus some shuffling of state funds. The balance comes from an estimated $33 million boost in the state's "pay or play" tax: If businesses don't offer "fair and reasonable" insurance to their employees, they get hit.
I am writing this in conjunction with Kavon, but according to several sources, Romney is the VP pick.
Remember who broke this story first.
by Jason Bonham 07/22/08 @ 2:57 pm.
http://race42008.com/2008/07/22/breaking-romney-vp-pick/
Magical Underpants?
Mitt was barely acceptable as a ‘Stop McCain’ vote. He sure as heck is NOT a strong conservative!
Mitt as VP is just another slap in conservatives faces.
He’s pretty ... but he’s not what he projects to the public.
The Evangelicals HATE him because he is a Mormon. Instead of making him a prayer target they'd rather HATE him, LIE about him and take ads out in papers to display their HATE for him.
AMEN!!!
Love Mitt, but I don't think the pick helps us anywhere. I prefer Palin or Jindal this time around.
Still, it's nice to have a guy who isn't afraid to take the gloves off and get dirty with the ruthless Dems. Mitt won't bring a knife to a political gun fight.
I gotta be honest and say I'm hoping for Palin or Jindal right now. But if it's Mitt - so be it. Maybe, just maybe, he can help an itty bit in Colorado or something - maybe make the Dems spend money in MI to defend their eventual victory there. But Veep is a different situation - it's about adding new voters. Palin or Jindal will do that; I don't think Mitt does.
Still, as I said: I'd still have the bumper sticker on my car and work my usual 60 hours of the “72 Hour GOTV” push in November. No reason to oppose Mitt, just not me first choice for Veep right now.
Mitt is a slick individual. He ran as pro-gay, anti-gun, and pro-choice to win in Mass and reversed those and other major positions to win the nomination. I really have no clue what the guy believes but I think its pretty clear that he is an opportunist.
I just got back from a Florida vacation. My first day there (Bay Point), I am sitting on my hotel balcony overlooking the front entrance, when I see John McCain’s bus pull up. Little did I know, he was holding a press conference there. As he disembarked from the bus, I shouted out “Pick Mitt!” I caught him again on the way out.
That will assure ny no vote!!