Posted on 08/03/2008 10:19:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
We who obsess over universal health coverage may soon confront a startling development: The only candidate on a major-party presidential ticket to have proposed and implemented a universal plan could well be a Republican. I speak of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, now high on the list of John McCain's possible running mates.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
Hes a Mormon, dont ya know, and that just isnt acceptable to the likes of some on this thread
You havent been reading a lot of the Romney threads, have you
Goofus and Gallant already have it.
I knew all those conservatives supported him but it seemed it was only because they absolutely could not stomach McCain. I’m not a fan of McCain but compared to Obama, McCain can hold the conservatives’ spot until someone like Jindal, Sandford, Pence or Coburn decide to run in 2016.
Here is an example of the latent and often unspoken but inferred continously anti-Mormonism that lurks below the surface, on this very thread, eyedigress:
Just posted by a Freeper:
“Romney has right RX for McCain
Magical Underpants?”
I like Pence and Coburn.
Jindal needs a bit more experience.. just a tad.
Sanford isn’t ready for Prime Time yet.
I disagree. The Stop McCain movement hadn’t even formed by Michigan and look how well he did there especially among conservatives.
He’s pretty ... but he’s not what he projects to the public.
Look at the Primary poll numbers from CNN at the top of this thread.
Perhaps after a little research you’ll change your mind.
That reminds me of one of the best “dry” lines from a Bond film where after a prickly encounter with Draco’s daughter Tracy, Draco says: “She likes you. I can see it.” And Bond returns the quip, “You must give me the name of your occulist.”
The Evangelicals HATE him because he is a Mormon. Instead of making him a prayer target they'd rather HATE him, LIE about him and take ads out in papers to display their HATE for him.
Vote for Nader... You win
Welcome to the party.
So sorry.. but nobody reads or believes your spam.
A May 2005 interview on Fox News illustrates the difficult path he's treading. Chris Wallace had Romney on a show with Boomer Esiason, a former NFL quarterback and proponent of embryonic stem cell research. After hearing Esiason make his case, Wallace turned to Romney.
"Let's talk first of all about the fact that you support the idea of using these embryos that are left over in fertility clinics and that would otherwise simply be thrown away," Wallace said.
Romney didn't directly address the point, saying that he draws the ethical line "in a very similar place" to that of Bush.
Wallace tried again: "But if I may ask you, governor, specifically, you don't see, as I understand it, the use of these leftover embryos in fertility clinics as destroying life?"
"That's right," Romney responded,
& Romney spoke with CBS News about his views and host Katie Couric asked Romney to describe the kind of embryonic stem cell research he might support. "So what kind of embryos -- embryos that are created for procreation and then would be discarded? Are those the ones that you feel are perfectly fine from which to cull cells for stem cell research?" Couric asked. "Yes," Romney responded, "those embryos that are referred to commonly as surplus embryos from in-vitro fertilization." Romney said he would first like to see human embryos adopted by families before put up for their destruction. However, he explained how he would have no problem with parents who want to allow those human embryos -- unique human beings -- to be destroyed for research. "But if a parent decides they would want to donate one of those embryos for purposes of research, in my view, that's acceptable," he said. "It should not be made against the law."
Preach it!
Whoo hoo!
I have been to many Churches in Nashville recently and they are not saying that at all. (This is the Bible Belt BTW)
Disgusting and disrespectful, isn’t it?
I could post something else just from today from another thread, but I won’t.
In the end I think Mitt will forgive McCain and take the job.
Mitt always puts the country before his own personal ambitions.
Mitt already has done this.
McPain is the childish one. He’s not mature enough as a person to do that. His temper and pride get in the way. McPain is not a prinsipled person. McPain is just slightly less scary than the Obomination. Either way, McPain or the Obomination will ruin this country. McPain will taz us to death with his envrionmental religion and the Obimination will push “global warming” for global socialism.
I don’t think we’re blind here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.