Posted on 08/03/2008 10:19:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
We who obsess over universal health coverage may soon confront a startling development: The only candidate on a major-party presidential ticket to have proposed and implemented a universal plan could well be a Republican. I speak of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, now high on the list of John McCain's possible running mates.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
Picking Romney is a big loser for McCain.
My wife doesn’t follow politics at all. Today she said she hoped Romney was VP?!?. If he can move her, he can move many middle of the roaders.
Your wife knows what she’s talking about.
Romney already has the base in place.. ready for an election year fight.
It's the hair. Does it every time. Sorta like that other liberal shuckster, Bill Clinton.
Reality will settle in. A business man is needed in the WH. Our Democrat Gov in Tennessee is kicking ass as far as smart goes.
Thanks for the constructive criticism. Who do you suggest?
Not according to Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, or anyone in my large happy family or any one of my many friends. But perhaps it would frustrate you and a handful of other people on Free Republic.
Before RomneyCare was enacted, estimates of the number of uninsured in Massachusetts ranged from 372,000 to 618,000. Under the new program, about 219,000 previously uninsured residents have signed up for insurance. Of these, 133,000 are receiving subsidized coverage, proving once again that people are all too happy to accept something "for free," and let others pay the bill. That is in addition to 56,000 people who have been signed up for Medicaid. The bigger the subsidy, the faster people are signing up. Of the 133,000 people who have signed up for insurance since the plan was implemented, slightly more than half have received totally free coverage. Its important to note that the subsidies in Massachusetts are extensive and reach well into the middle class-available on a sliding scale to those with incomes up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level. That means subsidies would be available for those with incomes ranging from $30,480 for a single individual to as much as $130,389 for a married couple with seven children. A typical married couple with two children would qualify for a subsidy if their income were below $63,000.\What we dont know is how many of those receiving subsidized insurance were truly uninsured and how many had insurance that either they or their employer was paying for. Studies indicate that substitution of taxpayer-financed for privately funded insurance is a common occurrence with other government programs such as Medicaid and the State Childrens Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP). Massachusetts has attempted to limit this "crowdout" effect by requiring that individuals be uninsured for at least six months before qualifying for subsidies. Still some substitution is likely to have occurred.
The subsidies may have increased the number of Massachusetts citizens with insurance, but as many as 400,000 Massachusetts residents by some estimates have failed to buy the required insurance. That includes the overwhelming majority of those with incomes too high to qualify for state subsidies. Fewer than 30,000 unsubsidized residents have signed up as a result of the mandate. And that is on top of the 60,000 of the states uninsured who were exempted from the mandate because buying insurance would be too much of a financial burden.
As does the Wall Street Journal: The Price of RomneyCare.
Mr. Patrick had already bumped up this year's spending to $869 million, $144 million over its original estimate. Liberals duly noted that these tax hikes are necessary because enrollment in Commonwealth Care is much higher than anticipated. But of course more people will have coverage if government gives it to them for free. The problem is that someone has to pay for it.Thus the extra tab of $129 million, which may need to go higher because it relies on uncertain federal funds from Medicaid. For now, Mr. Patrick wants one-time (yeah, right) charges of $33 million on insurers and $28 million on providers, plus some shuffling of state funds. The balance comes from an estimated $33 million boost in the state's "pay or play" tax: If businesses don't offer "fair and reasonable" insurance to their employees, they get hit.
Ron Paul is still running I hear. Nader and some guy with a bag of carbon might be out there also. It’s going to be a long time before RR comes back.
A failure is not a excuse to quit. It is an opportunity to try again, and again, until we get it right. I admire that Mitt had the guts to begin working on something most people have been avoiding. Sooner or later we have to address the problem of health care as an entitlement. Obviously there are problems with this early effort, just as the Wright brothers had some trouble staying a loft in their prototype flying machines.
Yup. Although I think Mitt’s extremely competent and would help out a lot in economic issues, his charisma may actually be a good offset to that of the “Messiah”.
And if McCain does not pick him for VP, I hope he’s appointed treasury sec. or given some other Cabinet position.
Sarah Palin...a conservative. Romney’s a liberal. One on the ticket is enough.
She’s as good choice a choice as any. I hate them all. All of them. My wife is a better indicator of American popular choice than a conservative FReeper however.
I agree that Romney care would be a failure of epic proportions country wide.
Personally, I can’t stand it.
However, I also think that McCain/Romney wins in November, and that no other ticket comes close to that prospect.
NObama 08
The American people would get behind Romney.
He’s Conservative, Intelligent, a brilliant debater and moral!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.