Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Savage Attack: Why Michael Savage is wrong about Autism & why Conservatives shouldn't support him.
National Review ^ | July 24, 2008 | John J. Pitney Jr.

Posted on 07/26/2008 12:06:03 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Last week, radio talk-show host Michael Savage talked about autism:

I’ll tell you what autism is. In 99 percent of the cases, it’s a brat who hasn’t been told to cut the act out. That's what autism is. What do you mean they scream and they're silent? They don’t have a father around to tell them, `Don't act like a moron. You'll get nowhere in life. Stop acting like a putz. Straighten up. Act like a man. Don’t sit there crying and screaming, idiot.” I’m not an impartial observer here. My six-year-old son has high-functioning autism. He is exactly the kind of kid that Savage attacked.

Savage’s comments were wrong and harmful. Some autistic kids do learn to read and speak, which is why misinformed people may think that they are not “genuinely handicapped.” Yes, they are. Autism is a brain disorder that affects everything from social communication to physical coordination. Autistic people have multiple problems that make it hard for them to do things that the rest of us take for granted. It may take them years to learn how to toss a ball or nod their head.

And even when they can talk, they often have odd speech patterns that instantly mark them as autistic. Other kids taunt them with the very words that Savage used. If they respond verbally, their speech problems will draw even more taunting. If they respond with their fists, they run the risk that authorities will label them as “violent.”

Once in a while, parents take the approach that Savage recommends. It never works. Screaming insults at a handicapped kid is not child-rearing. It’s child abuse.

Conservatives need to speak out against Savage. Many news stories label him as “conservative” or “right-wing,” which may prompt some people to think that we agree with him. Savage has a long history of disgusting comments, which has led David Klinghoffer to speculate that his act is a giant liberal put-on, a “lefty’s cartoon mental picture of a ranting right-wing caveman.”

The liberal website Media Matters has spearheaded the backlash against Savage’s autism comments. Understandably, conservatives might be uneasy about siding with such an outfit. Savage has tried to exploit such feelings by casting his critics as PC leftists. But just because the folks at Media Matters oppose child abuse, it doesn’t follow that we conservatives should accept it just for the sake of disagreeing with them.

Besides, liberals do not have a corner on concern for autism. California’s 1969 Lanterman Act was a landmark in serving people with autism and other disabilities. Its sponsor was a Republican, as was the governor who signed it: Ronald Reagan. In 2006, President Bush signed the Combating Autism Act. Its author was Senator Rick Santorum (R., PA).

Savage has cited respectable commentators who suggest that many kids with the autistic label are merely late talkers. His defense fails on two counts. First, these commentators don’t speak in the hateful language that he has used. Second, although they make their argument in good faith, they get things backward.

When you first notice that your child has a speech delay — around his second birthday — autism is the last thing that you want to think about. Autism is devastating and frightening. It’s more comforting to think that your kid is just starting late and will catch up soon. Clutching the “late talker” security blanket, some parents wait months or years before admitting the possibility of autism.

At that point, they may indeed conclude that a formal diagnosis could be important in getting help. States and school districts often pay for the assessment. Every autism diagnosis means thousands of dollars for services that the federal government mandates but does not fully subsidize. With tight budgets, the authorities have no incentive to encourage overdiagnosis. Once in a while, a child may incorrectly get the autism label, but underdiagnosis is probably a much bigger problem.

We need more study of the causes and prevalence of autism. At the moment, though, the issue is Michael Savage’s attack. He has since claimed that he is a nice guy who wants help to go to those who truly need it. Nonsense. If he cared about autistic kids, he wouldn’t have spewed words such as “moron” and “idiot.”

And he shouldn’t claim to be a conservative. He has cheapened political discourse and hurt defenseless children. There’s nothing conservative about that.

—- John J. Pitney Jr. is the Roy P. Crocker Professor of Government at Claremont McKenna College.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: autism; disorders; mediamatters; michaelweiner; savage; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-391 last
To: lormand

What a surprise!

Weiner don’t like the Lady:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2070803/posts?page=10#10


381 posted on 08/29/2008 4:37:14 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Wait!

Wiener may be changing his mind:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2070803/posts?page=24#24


382 posted on 08/29/2008 4:39:40 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: lormand; whatisthetruth

Check out today’s Wiener Nation thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2070803/posts

It’s a hoot!

With one exception, EVERY poster on the thread is pretty disgusted with Wiener’s slams on Sarah Palin. Even the regulars.

The exception? “whatisthetruth” is still defending the Wiener.

lol


383 posted on 08/29/2008 4:53:23 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Freepers don’t care for Weiner:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2070907/posts


384 posted on 08/29/2008 6:11:32 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Direct hit on Weiner Nation!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2070803/posts?page=128#128


385 posted on 08/29/2008 6:27:52 PM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
"The exception? “whatisthetruth” is still defending the Wiener."

The true, unabashed BOT if there have ever been one.

No man, has that much devotion from me. To think that someone continues to defend this STEAMING POS is beyond understanding.

God is the only one I BOT for.

386 posted on 09/02/2008 6:50:30 AM PDT by lormand ("If I were Putin, I would have done the same" - "Conservative" talk show host Mikhail Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: lormand; whatisthetruth

Good post!


387 posted on 09/02/2008 8:55:25 AM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Checkers; whatisthetruth
The chickens are coming home to roost on regarding Weiner and Freerepublic. The Weiner thread is full of chaos.

It is a SUPER-DUPER "See I told you so" moment.

388 posted on 09/02/2008 9:12:59 AM PDT by lormand (The Savage Nation - a parody by liberals of conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Palin bashing, autism denying, Putin toadying...

...I wonder what fresh Dog poop Weiner will step in today...

...unless he takes the safe route and devotes his show to dog poopery, one of the few subjects he may know something about...


389 posted on 09/02/2008 10:18:01 AM PDT by Checkers (McCain: "Hillary Clinton would make a good President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor
my nearly 30 yro dtr lives with us and she has Aspergers which is high functioning autism....

while she is not a lot of trouble, she has few social skills, no work skills, poor communication skills, lacks perception, lacks good gross or fine motor skills, but that is improving some....she can not pick up sarcasm, or intonation, or satire ...she's a whiz at Jeopardy and can record off the tv unto a dvd and knows her way somewhat around a computer....

will she every marry?.....doubt it...she doesn't particularly like touching....work?...well, she has to really work at it to count money....has poor time/spatial perceptions....is slow to respond.....is paranoid about people....obsessive compulsive in many ways.

I think she'll be living with us our entire lives and believe me, I only WISH I could just give her a good talking too....

390 posted on 09/03/2008 1:54:07 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
there is no question that 50 yrs ago, kids that were a little different sat next to "normal" ones, and no one singled them out for being different....."that's just Mary...or that's just the way Robert is"

my dtr only takes medicine for her other condition.....I don't know what would work when you are an adult with Aspergers......'

391 posted on 09/03/2008 1:58:05 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-391 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson