Beam Me to Planet Gore !
Why can't they just swim there? On the other hand, if the ice is melting on the North Pole, why wouldn't it be melting on the South Pole? It is GLOBAL warming - no? (Sorry about that. Sometimes my common sense kicks in...)
If they think polar bears are tough on seals, wait til they see what they can do to a flock of penguins!
Hmmm...I hope the other scientists encamped at the So. Pole haven’t read the story about the two Russian guards at a Siberian mine that were eaten by black bears this week.
Sometimes things are better left alone...
If we figure out some good recipes for polar bear meat, they will never go extinct.
|
Great idea! Big problem of course, is food. I suggest we kill two birds with one stone and feed them raw, living liberals. PETA folks in particular ought to volunteer in droves -- after all, this would be nothing but Ethical Treatment of (displaced) Animals...
...and it helps rid the world of nasty, consuming, humans.
And sets an example for the rest of us.
*\;-)
Since the vast majority of bears do not /ever/ touch the permanent north polar ice pack, taking them to Antarctica would put them in a far worse environment, disrupting their natural cycle, and ultimately kill the species.
But of course, to liberals, it is the thought that counts. So in the interest of serving liberal ideology, and striking a blow against King Meat!, I advocate putting polar bears in walk in freezers at meat packing warehouses, large commercial restaurant chains, Walmart, and anywhere else that doesn't follow the proper political thought of the day!
Why not just move them to the more liberal cities like San Francisco and New York? I’m sure they’ll find more plentiful food sources than at the South Pole.
There is one thing these “scientists” forget. The adaption of the species, any species, to change.
This is pure hype.
The bears may end up living at both extremes, but it is these “scientists” who are bi-polar...
Polar bears have lasted through other cycles of “global warming” over 10s of millions of years. They are still here.
If the scientists are so worried, rather than move the bears, why not offer up themselves for a survival snack for the polar bears? Maybe the Gorester could start a trend???
It’s generally a mistake to mess with the natural order of things. Recall the brilliant move introduce water hiacinyth to Florida, the following decision to introduce the manatee to eat the waterway choking plants, and the ensuing chopping up of the manatee with boat props. Now we have pythons and boa constrictors loose in florida. Thousands of examples of the unintended effects of man fooling around with natural selection exist throughout history - usually with disastrous consequences. The on thing we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.
Scientists Debate Moving Polar Bears to Antarctica as Arctic Melts
++++++++++++++++++
What an enormous task!!!! Any idiot scientist should know that it’d be a lot easier to simply move the ice from Antarctica up north. The U.N. should be in on this effort ofcourse. /s
Here is a better solution.
A radical notion about ‘the wild’
Toronto Star July 13, 2008 Murray Whyte
Posted on Thursday July 24, 15:10:46 GMT-0700 2008 by girlangler
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2050807/posts
Didn’t I read a few days ago that Anchorage is experiencing their coldest winter on record?
That's all I needed to know...
One other bright idea that “scientists” had, was back in the ‘70s when “Global Cooling” was all the rage. Their solution to “Global Cooling” was to spread crude oil on the snow covered Arctic in order to absorb the sun’s heat rather than reflecting it back into the sky.
I kid you not.
It’s going to cost billions to move the bears from one pole to the other. And guess who they want to pay for it all?
