Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/23/2008 1:00:23 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: nickcarraway

This is the only time in history a torpedo caused a secondary explosion < /Rosie>


2 posted on 07/23/2008 1:02:18 PM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It was probably the center fuel tank.....


3 posted on 07/23/2008 1:03:39 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Unfortunetly the germans probably had good reason to sink it. Just saying!


4 posted on 07/23/2008 1:03:54 PM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Aw, fer cryin’ out loud!!!!! Do I need an “Imaging Licence” to take a picture of the Blarney Stone, too?????


5 posted on 07/23/2008 1:04:43 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Of course, if you question whether we should have gotten into the First World War, you must be pro-Hitler.


6 posted on 07/23/2008 1:04:45 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Gregg Bemis, who bought the remains of the vessel for £1,000 from former partners in a diving business in 1968, has been granted an imaging licence by the Department of the Environment.

If it's his, why does he have to get permission to take pictures of it?

7 posted on 07/23/2008 1:06:28 PM PDT by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

It’s not clear from this article what the Department of the Environment’s concern is. Barnacles?


8 posted on 07/23/2008 1:07:02 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. You shed your skin, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I thought it was already pretty well established that the Lusitania was carrying munitions.


15 posted on 07/23/2008 1:12:27 PM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“Bemis is hoping that the week-long filming project, which begins today, will prove his theory that the Lusitania was carrying explosives, and that these were the cause of the mysterious second blast.”

I believe dives have already brought up explosive armaments? I recall seeing a program some time ago where they showed caps made by bethlehem steel that had been recovered.


21 posted on 07/23/2008 1:14:52 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Read it was coal dust that caused the major damage when it exploded from the torpedo ....


24 posted on 07/23/2008 1:16:00 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do Our Politicians Will")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

31 posted on 07/23/2008 1:19:10 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Coal Dust Explosion
39 posted on 07/23/2008 1:23:12 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I read sometime back that the Lusitania wreck is not in very good condition due to its shallow depth and the combined effects of corrosive seawater and storm surging (essentially turned into huge heap of collapsed-in plates slowly being rusted/crumbled into bits). There might not be very much “evidence” left in the forward hull area to be collected.

Does anyone have current information on the wreck’s actual condition?

54 posted on 07/23/2008 1:32:31 PM PDT by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Fascinating article and discussion!


57 posted on 07/23/2008 1:34:13 PM PDT by trillabodilla (Jesus Saves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

***The RMS Lusitania sank off the coast of Cork in May 1915 when a German U-boat torpedoed it. An undetermined second explosion is believed to have speeded its sinking, with 1,198 passengers and crew losing their lives. ***

If I remember my history, the German embassy took out adds in the NY newspapers warning passengers that the ship was carrying munitions of war to the English and would be a legitimate target.


68 posted on 07/23/2008 1:44:52 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Riddle of Lusitania sinking may finally be solved

“The RMS Lusitania sank off the coast of Cork in May 1915 when a German U-boat torpedoed it.”

Riddle solved.


71 posted on 07/23/2008 1:45:27 PM PDT by weegee (Obama loves America like Bill loves Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

This is going by memory so I could be wrong but I thought I saw a TV doc about the Lusitania sinking and it claimed the liner had an escort part of the journey across the Atlantic then when the liner was near the Irish coast the escorts went away eventhough the coast off Ireland was a favorite U-Boat hunting ground. This was part of the theory the Brits wanted the Lusitania torpodeod to bring the US into the war.


81 posted on 07/23/2008 1:54:08 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; All
Bob Ballard, the man who discovered the wreck of the Titanic, has also investigated the Lusitania's wreck. His conclusion, which sounds eminently reasonable, is that the secondary explosion that sank the ship was caused by the torpedo detonating coal dust in the ship's bunkers.

His theory is based on the fact that, to keep a very large ship like Lusitania in trim, the engine crew (aka Black Gang) had to be constantly moving the coal from one bunker to another; hence keeping the boilers fired involved what amounted to continuous coal mining, a process that produced huge amounts of highly explosive (when mixed with the oxygen in the air) coal dust. Then, when the torpedo entered this explosive environment it functioned as a super detonator, igniting the clouds of coal dust the same way an electric spark can operate in a grain elevator filed with grain dust.

83 posted on 07/23/2008 1:54:23 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Gregg Bemis, who bought the remains of the vessel for £1,000 from former partners in a diving business in 1968, has been granted an imaging licence by the Department of the Environment. This allows him to photograph and film the entire structure, and should allow him to produce the first high-resolution pictures of the historic vessel.

Someone please explain how you buy a shipwreck, and then have to get a license from the government to take pictures of what you purchased???

86 posted on 07/23/2008 1:59:06 PM PDT by TheBattman (Vote your conscience, or don't complain about RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Maybe the Lusitania was carrying contraband munitions. That would account for the secondary explosions and for its targeting by the German navy.


92 posted on 07/23/2008 2:05:39 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson