[Antoninus]

The one-trick pony of gay marraige fear isn’t going to work anymore.

Tell you what? Don't waste your breath trying to impose your immorality upon me and my country, ok?

If the voters of CA accept butt-sex fake marriage, that's their issue. If they try to impose it upon me and my locality via the "full faith and credit" clause, we'll take it to a Constitutional Amendment.

In my opinion, I think butt-sex marriage is going down in CA thanks to the will of the voters.

[Boagenes]

Trust me, the majority is going to vote in support of the amendment. This is just the MSM trying to stage things. They’re full of crap. This measure will pass by 55% or more.

[MinnesotaLibertarian]

I’m not imposing anything on anyone. I don’t think government should be in the business of defining a religious institution to begin with, be it in favor of gay marriage or against it.

By the way, why is it your mind always goes to “butt-sex”? I think that says a lot about you.

[fwdude]

...we'll take it to a Constitutional Amendment.

Good point, Ant. If the libertarians are so concerned about government wasting valuable time and resources on a "petty" issue like same-sex fake marriage in California, then they should have the foresight to look down the road at the herculean task of getting a NATIONAL Defense of Marriage Amendment passed. The effort in California is minuscule in comparison, and failure in this state will almost guarantee the need for a Federal Amendment when the assault on the DOMA begins. I say, nipping an assault closer to its inception is very prudent and fiscally responsible.