Posted on 07/08/2008 7:50:56 AM PDT by flowerplough
"Sometimes, a term of endearment can be anything but endearing.
"I had this manager who started referring to me as 'honey,'" recalls May Snowden, former chief diversity officer for both Starbucks and Eastman Kodak Co. (one of DiversityInc's 25 Noteworthy Companies), who is now a consultant for Creative Wealth Alliance. "[It was] when I took my first director position. I was in a male-dominated job in the telecommunications industry and I did not want to embarrass him in front of his peers, so I invited him to my office and indicated that 'I won't call you sweetie if you won't call me honey.' We had that little conversation and he stopped. He was really embarrassed, [and because] he calls his wife, his daughters and other women 'honey', he did not even think about it."
"We all come to the table with biases and histories and upbringings in life that give us a perspective that may have 20, 30 years behind it," says Sherry Nolan, vice president of diversity and organizational capabilities at Pepsi Bottling Group..."
(The List:
Any kind of sexual comment
"You don't really want that promotion. You'll never see your kids."
"You'll get the job because you're a woman" or "You must be the token woman"
"What's the matter, is it that time of the month?"
"You're very attractive [or pretty, or beautiful, etc.]"
"You look great for your age" or "Do you use Botox?"
"You do that so well for a girl."
"When are you due?")
(Excerpt) Read more at diversityinc.com ...
If a woman isn't for sale, she shouldn't advertise.
Do you know why it is called PMS?
Because Mad Cow Disease was already taken.. LOL..
I'll have you know that the temperature in my office just went up 20 degrees, from laughing so hard after reading that!
Quite correct. If you mean business, dress for business. It might not mean the same severe three-piece suits I used to wear but even with all the latitude of women’s clothing, there is appropriate and inappropriate fashion.
When I was a second-year law student I attended a Women in Law convention in San Francisco in about 1980. I should have been a bit less naive but I didn’t even check into the sessions. It was a school trip and about ten of us were packing into a university van and traveling to California so that was enough. I packed my nifty blue 3-piece suit, white button-up shirt and sensible pumps and showed up so attired at the opening session. I thought I’d mistakenly walked into a hippie convention. The dress was slovenly. The hair and makeup (what there was) was slovenly. The attitudes were even worse. This was the anti-feminine era. As a warm-up act, the moderator asked participants to stand up as characteristics applied to them: practicing? students? Californians? Out-of-staters? The shocker for me was when she asked the lesbians to stand up and it appeared that a third to half the audience stood and cheered. Turned out that was how the convention sessions were proportioned. Most were either advocating gay rights or agitating for passing the Equal Rights Amendment. Since I was fulfilling an assignment being there I attended the most innocuous and professional sessions I could (although I checked out the ERA harridans also out of curiosity and to know the enemy) but out of sheer rebelliousness I wore my three-piece suit the entire time. I enjoyed being a temporary radical.
I was told "you don't dip your pen in the company ink."
This one is more often directed at Black males, thanks in large part to the media, which often portrays Black men as being angry and/or criminals.
Yeah. Lipstick on a pig. Her "job" was "diversity extortion".
Thanks, and bump for later .................. FRegards
Many years ago, I went to a job interview and faced an all-male panel.
The first thing they said to me was, “We were expecting a man!”
(I have a gender-neutral name)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.