Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grig

[Except two courts rejected the idea that there was anything deceptive about it. It was a very clear example of tounge in cheek parody, which REQUIRES the reader to realize that it is a deliberate parody to get the joke.]

Come now, the joke is that Mormons are so paranoid about the Tanners that they would stoop so low.

Heck, you guys can’t even take postings of your secret handshakes or underwear without going ballistic. I think we know who can’t take a joke.


68 posted on 07/04/2008 5:19:46 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: FastCoyote
Heck, you guys can’t even take postings of your secret handshakes or underwear without going ballistic.

You KNOW that would VIOLATE our Trademark® and we CAN sue your GENTILE AS oops - BUTTS off!

--MormonDude(Not that we would ACTUALLY do that of course: but there IS that Federal Law out there...)

98 posted on 07/09/2008 5:05:02 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson