There is not a single of mention of the police using BULLETS
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I said the bullets were in the guns on the hip.
Rational citizens **know** that if they resist the police there is a real risk that the police will use those bullets. This is the essence of government compulsion. It **means** police action will be taken if you fail to comply with the government. It **means** that if you then resist the police those police may use those bullets.
Government Laws mean that the government can and often will use police action if the laws are not obeyed.
Government schools **laws** mean that the government can and will use police action if the citizen fails to comply.
Here in the U.S. citizens can **ransom** their children from the government indoctrination centers. They can do so by paying a **freedom of conscience tax**. This means that not only do they pay private tuition to ransom their children and support their conscience but they also support the government religion of Secular Humanism and the political and cultural agenda of their political opponents in the government schools.
I didn't see your post before I last posted. Yes, I guess an unloaded gun isn't much of a threat of force.
That is very much in line with conservative/libertarian thought. Years ago, I was reluctant to listen to that line of thinking, but eventually I had to admit it was correct: We do pay our taxes (and many parents must send their children to school) under threat of force, and there's always a gun behind it.
This is an out right lie.
You will not repeat your lies again, or I will report your libelous statements to the moderators.