Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Winged American

This headline is complete cr@p. I feel bad for the Freepers, esp. the VN vets, who fall for it. The VA is doing no such thing. And if you read the whole thing, you’ll see that.


28 posted on 06/30/2008 10:12:38 AM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Snickersnee

I see that. And I thought only AP headlines were misleading ...


33 posted on 06/30/2008 10:17:45 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Snickersnee
From the article:

All aircraft pilots who flew off aircraft carriers during the time of the Vietnam War, as stipulated by the DVA to be January 9, 1962 to May 7, 1975, are therefore Vietnam Era veterans, as they are all Blue Water Navy veterans. They are also non-Vietnam War veterans. All jet fighter pilots who may have flown in the "airspace above" the Republic of Vietnam, or above North Vietnam or any of the surrounding countries, are also exempt from herbicide coverage and therefore are titled Vietnam Era veterans. Furthermore, all US Navy pilots who were shot down over North Vietnam, who landed by parachute in North Vietnam, and were not fortunate to have landed in the Republic of Vietnam, fall under this re-written definition of Vietnam Era veterans. A pilot from an aircraft carrier who became a POW and was kept in captivity anywhere but on the soil of the Republic of Vietnam, is now officially referred to as non-Vietnam War veterans. All POWs who spent time in the prison called the Hanoi Hilton, or any other place not located in South Vietnam, receive this new title as well. John McCain, Jim Stockdale and all others in this predicament have been re-classified by the Department of Veterans Affairs as Vietnam Era veterans. Public reference to them as Vietnam War veterans is incorrect, per the new re-written history presented by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Our Presidential Candidate should no longer refer to himself as a veteran of the Vietnam War. This title is being stripped from him by the DVA. And just imagine the embarrassment of having to remove names chiseled in the stone the Vietnam Memorial Wall.

Now what exactly are we misinterpreting?

37 posted on 06/30/2008 10:20:51 AM PDT by frankiep (Every socialist is a disguised dictator - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Snickersnee
"According to the Brown presentation of 2004, only individuals who served with 'boots on the ground' in South Vietnam would be referred to as 'Vietnam War veterans.' All others in the Vietnam War, between 1962 and 1975, would be referred to as Vietnam Era veterans or non-Vietnam War veterans."

So how, exactly, is this headline "crap"?

52 posted on 06/30/2008 11:22:00 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Terrorist organizations worldwide endorse Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Snickersnee

darn, I’ve read it a couple times and it still sends the same message. When I went to the web site, there’s a lot more to back this up. I guess if you’re on their payroll, the VA must not be half-bad. You just need to re-read it very slowly. I don’t see the cr@p - other than what’s being dished out by the VA.


110 posted on 07/01/2008 4:08:15 AM PDT by johnfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson