I don't have to prove my American loyalties to you, you little babbling punk. When you have been here for more than five minutes, then you can start questioning me & my American loyalties.
"Second, the world powers desire PEACE. If it means adjusting the same borders they set, so be it. They giveth, they taketh.
Then you aren't just a Muslim Liberal propagandist, you are a globalist, too. Again, you are in the wrong place for that BS, junior.
Third, there is no unlimited sovereignty. Just as free speech and other are limited so is sovereignty.
You are pulling that crap out of your butt -- the legal limits on sovereignty and free speech are spelled out by rule of law, not just the point of a gun.
"Many wanted the US to intervene in Rwanda...."
Kosovo was NOT Rwanda! A million people died in Rwanda for their ethnicity, much like Jews had died in the Nazi camps. Less than 5,000 had died ON ALL SIDES, in Kosovo before the 1999 NATO Bombing, in a war of secession. Comparing the two is comparing apples to oranges. And beside, last time I checked, we were NOT redrawing the borders of Rwanda.
It is absolutely insane to me that anyone calling themselves "a Conservative" (which you surely aren't) would defend the illegal seizure of private property & violation of legal sovereignty, in favor of a socialist/communist model of "seizure of private property for collective ownership" and "overthrowing the haves in favor of the have-nots". That isn't a Conservative philosophy, it's Communism!
less die because you never had a chance to rape and murder like in Bosnia. I mean “allegedly, according to Soros propaganda.”
This is as illegal as you taking Kosovo in 1912 with mother Russia’s help Obama girl.
Kosovo will be there when NATO leaves. Go and get it, you sure do know how to fight. At least the French don’t brag about losing or surrendering like cowards.
And be nice to Muslims, given how many Serbian girls were in Turkish harems...
I’ve been following the thread and I have to say that this issue is far more complex and confusing than I ever imagined and am way over my head in even engaging in the discussion. The thing I can’t help wondering though and must ask is how those on the pro-albania muslims side would feel about the country of Mexico taking the SW of the U.S.
We are experiencing a huge migration of Mexican citizens into our SW. What if the numbers grow to the point that they eventually make up over 90% of the population? Since possession seems to be 9/10th of the law these days, would they be justified in taking back the SW? How would the U.S. feel if this happened and some country with a much more powerful military came in and intervened on the side of Mexico? After-all, Mexico would have a legitimate point in that ethnic hispanics from Mexico have had a presence in the SW of the U.S. for many years.