Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edging Away From Air Force, Army Adds Air Unit
NYT ^ | June 21st, 2008 | THOM SHANKER

Posted on 06/21/2008 4:59:25 PM PDT by The_Republican

WASHINGTON — Ever since the Army lost its warplanes to a newly independent Air Force after World War II, soldiers have depended on the sister service for help from the sky, from bombing and strafing to transport and surveillance.

But the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have frayed the relationship, with Army officers making increasingly vocal complaints that the Air Force is not pulling its weight.

In Afghanistan, Army officers have complained about bombing missions gone awry that have killed innocent civilians. In Iraq, Army officers say the Air Force has often been out of touch, fulfilling only half of their requests for the sophisticated surveillance aircraft that ground commanders say are needed to find roadside bombs and track down insurgents.

The Air Force responds that it has only a limited number of those remotely piloted Predators and other advanced surveillance aircraft, so priorities for assigning them must be set by senior commanders at the headquarters in Baghdad working with counterparts at the Air Force’s regional command in Qatar. There are more than 14,000 airmen performing tasks on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan, including Air Force civil engineers replacing Army construction engineers.

But now in Iraq, the Army has quietly decided to try going it alone for the important surveillance mission, organizing an all-Army surveillance unit that represents a new move by the service toward self-sufficiency, and away from joint operations.

Senior aides to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates say that he has shown keen interest in the Army initiative — much to the frustration of embattled Air Force leaders — as a potential way to improve battlefield surveillance.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: armyvsairforce; usaf; usarmy; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2008 4:59:25 PM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Air Force civil engineers replacing Army construction engineers

<ARMY>We've apparently reached the "Bowling Alley" phase of reconstruction.</ARMY>

= )

2 posted on 06/21/2008 5:10:31 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican; Squantos; Travis McGee

Give the Army the A-10’s and their drivers, the Air Force doesn’t want them anyway.


3 posted on 06/21/2008 5:22:36 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

LOL! Now that’s funny!


4 posted on 06/21/2008 5:31:24 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Personal Methane Reclamation: Break wind for energy independence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

The Air Farce is doing everything the can to make themselves irrelevant in the 21st century.


5 posted on 06/21/2008 5:49:23 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1
You are right. The Air Force is desparate to avoid the future of unmanned aircraft. If they continue to prove their effectiveness, the Air Force can see the future, and it includes fewer fighter jocks, something they will resist. That was the significance of Gates replacing the fighter leadership with a rotor head.
6 posted on 06/21/2008 6:10:07 PM PDT by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
USAF Carrier


7 posted on 06/21/2008 6:16:15 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Good point. That must be why the USAF has just upgraded the A-10s to the A-10C...

I think you would also be hard pressed to find any A-10 drivers who want to go to the Army. And frankly, I’ve worked enough CAS to know the Army has limited understanding of how to employ air assets!


8 posted on 06/21/2008 6:16:31 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Old, pale and stale - McCain in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clee1
The Air Farce is doing everything the can to make themselves irrelevant in the 21st century.

They sure aren't scoring any points in this household. My 18 year old scored 95 percent averages on all his aptitude tests. They subsequently permanently disqualified him - that's right, permanently disqualified him because of his nearsightedness.

And no, he was going nowhere near an airplane or a battlefield. He was hoping to do geospatial intelligence, satellite tracking, techie stuff.

9 posted on 06/21/2008 6:22:06 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

“In contrast to Predators, which are assigned by the top headquarters for missions all across Iraq, Task Force Odin is on call for commanders at the level of brigade and below...”

What they fail to point out is that the air is apportioned out IAW the direction of ARMY COMMANDERS! I worked for a BDE/CC who was upset that I wasn’t ‘giving him air’. He was even more upset when I told him he wasn’t getting it because he was on the bottom of the totem pole - IAW his DIV/CC.

I think he was even more upset when the General told him the same thing I said - that he was only going to get left overs because the priority was elsewhere.


10 posted on 06/21/2008 6:22:15 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Old, pale and stale - McCain in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

That’s OK. The Army wouldn’t take my son because his hearing wasn’t good enough - even for field artillery.

The Army Guard tested him and said he had ‘perfect hearing’ - he’s been working in the CA Army Guard ever since. Half deaf, but it doesn’t affect his performance on a bulldozer...


11 posted on 06/21/2008 6:24:17 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Old, pale and stale - McCain in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

No. Give them to the Marine Corp.


12 posted on 06/21/2008 6:26:03 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Could you put it in English?


13 posted on 06/21/2008 6:27:52 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

There’s plenty of blame to spread around amongst the services. The air force finds themselves in the middle of a war in which 90% of its pre-war TTPs were counterproductive to COIN warfare. The US Army is just now learning lessons it SHOULD have learned in Vietnam or sooner. The Navy finds themselves mostly out of the fight but are gearing up for the strongest navy in the Middle East in Iran. The Marines really seem to be the shinning jewel in the crown. They’re an organization that does extremely well at institutional learning, have a bottom-up initiative flow and do well in small groups.

Reading through the new Army/Marine Corps COIN Field Manual, co-authored by General Petraeus, an unbelievably brilliant man, gives me hope that we may just get this insurgency thing right one day, as each day in Iraq shows we’re starting to get the hang of it.


14 posted on 06/21/2008 6:40:44 PM PDT by Per-Ling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

With all due respect, there are plenty of people who score 95% who don’t have nearsightedness. Being angry about them holding their standards high is a little petty, isn’t it?


15 posted on 06/21/2008 7:15:03 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
Image and video hosting by TinyPic Tick-Tock-Tick-Tock,,,;0) Image and video hosting by TinyPic
16 posted on 06/21/2008 7:18:26 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
The Air Force responds that it has only a limited number of those remotely piloted Predators and other advanced surveillance aircraft, so priorities for assigning them must be set by senior commanders at the headquarters in Baghdad working with counterparts at the Air Force’s regional command in Qatar.

And the reason why the AF does not have enough UAVs is because they prefer to spend their budget money on other things

17 posted on 06/21/2008 7:28:19 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

I understood it.


18 posted on 06/21/2008 7:31:38 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

Ouch. As an exAirman I resent that. As an exAirman I also laugh because I know it has an element of truth. Ouch.


19 posted on 06/21/2008 7:31:44 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

BDE/CC - Brigade commander
DIV/CC - Division commander

Brigades are subordinate to Divisions.

(IAW - in accordance with)


20 posted on 06/21/2008 7:32:50 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson