Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6
My only point about the datestamp (perhaps poorly made) is that given how complete his analysis was, he failed to mention anything about the datestamp.

-PJ

104 posted on 06/17/2008 7:51:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Well, it means the piece of paper was in existence on that date on the back, so it was not recently requested and printed by Hawaii.


111 posted on 06/17/2008 7:58:21 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

I believe that the name is a residual from the original document that was used as the template for the forgery, and as such left there on purpose to give it some authenticity.

Which brings up an interesting possibility, was Barack Obama in Hawaii to get this document on the day marked on the backside?

If as we have been told they only issue these certifications to those that they are about wouldn’t Obama need to be there to get it?


113 posted on 06/17/2008 8:01:14 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson