Skip to comments.
Exponential Technologies: Cheer Up World—We Are On the Verge of Great Things
dailygalaxy ^
| June 05, 2008
Posted on 06/06/2008 11:19:43 PM PDT by ckilmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
06/06/2008 11:19:43 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
“... science may well turn out to be our savior.”
Already got one, thank you.
But otherwise, a nice piece.
2
posted on
06/06/2008 11:22:15 PM PDT
by
karnage
To: ckilmer
The odd thing about this conference is that
Nanosolar has already beaten coal in terms of cost for electricity production.
3
posted on
06/06/2008 11:28:31 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
(Phi)
To: ckilmer
and a computer will pass the Turing Test by carrying on a conversation that is indistinguishable from a humans.But alas, a liberal will probably program its soul.
4
posted on
06/06/2008 11:29:49 PM PDT
by
umgud
To: ckilmer
I say he's pessimistic. Many of these things and even more amazing ones already exist but are not being fully developed. 6-8 years from now OPEC will be a joke we tell each other as we get into our electric vehicles. Nuclear power is already proven and each city could have a nuclear power plant already running if we had the will.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf33.html
5
posted on
06/07/2008 12:07:32 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only the Marxist Obama can!)
To: umgud
But alas, a liberal will probably program its soul. Not likely....few liberals make good engineers or scientists.
6
posted on
06/07/2008 12:08:37 AM PDT
by
Mogollon
(Vote straight GOP for congress....our only protection against Obama, or McCain.)
To: ckilmer
The climate megalomaniacs are not interested in actual solutions....they thrive on lack of actual solutions. Nanotech, indeed is offering more potential solutions than industry can deal with at the moment...it is difficult to pick which ones are most promising as new advances come out each week...a site such as www.physorg.com is a good source (just one of several) of daily reported advances.
7
posted on
06/07/2008 12:13:40 AM PDT
by
givemELL
To: ckilmer
Kurzweil makes a very persuasive case that we are past the elbow of an exponential increase in technology that started with the origin of life and will explode in about 40 years. Check out
The Law of Accelerating Returns for a good read for the intelligent layman.
8
posted on
06/07/2008 12:39:41 AM PDT
by
Mentos
To: ckilmer
Unfortunately, much of Kurzweil's
recent track record isn't so good.
There has been slowing in the rate of technological advance recently, not exponential increase. It's not that we're making no progress...it's the rate. While Moore's Law is holding, with more circuits crammed onto a chip, we're not seeing clock speeds and processing power skyrocketing up like they used to.
And America is backsliding in educational levels. But maybe China and India can grab the banner as America recedes...after all, they have more honor students than we have total students.
9
posted on
06/07/2008 12:50:17 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
You discount the power of freedom.
Innovation and a straight jacket are not compatible.
10
posted on
06/07/2008 1:06:00 AM PDT
by
DB
To: ckilmer
To: ckilmer
Are we going to choose to remain human?
Are our mechanical betters going to choose to keep us around?
12
posted on
06/07/2008 1:20:39 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Now that we use our corn for fuel, when do we eat coal for dinner?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I say he's pessimistic." "if we had the will."
Yeah we "could have" IF - but we don't. Who's a pessimist?
13
posted on
06/07/2008 1:26:24 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Now that we use our corn for fuel, when do we eat coal for dinner?)
To: ckilmer
I think it won’t be long before there are humanoid robots that are indistinguishable from humans, and people will be able to custom design their own mate(s). Of course, that was predicted by Rod Serling over 45 years ago.
To: endthematrix
"Who's a pessimist?" The futurist described in the article, IMO.
15
posted on
06/07/2008 1:38:11 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only the Marxist Obama can!)
To: ckilmer
within 50 years we will BE the borg. cant wait.
16
posted on
06/07/2008 3:06:18 AM PDT
by
truemiester
((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
To: snarks_when_bored
"For balance: It's not exponential, it's sigmoidal" Actually, it's multisigmoidal.
To: ckilmer
If I can only just fit 225,342 songs on my iPod, I’ll be happy.
18
posted on
06/07/2008 3:29:05 AM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(I am 58 days away from outliving Vicki Sue Robinson)
To: ckilmer
We now know that all inventions were one “in our future” So may be time travel. Weather it’s 300 yrs from now or 30,000 from now. Maybe this explains some of the things we have been seeing in our skies?
19
posted on
06/07/2008 3:56:43 AM PDT
by
Waco
To: ckilmer
Kurzweil is a very interesting guy. He actually expects technology to advance fast enough to allow him to live forever. Think I'm kidding? Read his book:
Live Long Enough to Live Forever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson