Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine sniper facing manslaughter charges [Sgt. John Winnick II]
North County Times ^ | June 5, 2008 | MARK WALKER

Posted on 06/05/2008 7:04:51 PM PDT by RedRover

CAMP PENDLETON ---- A Marine sniper has been charged with two counts of voluntary manslaughter in the June 2007 deaths of two civilians in Iraq.

The sniper, Sgt. John Winnick II, faces additional accusations of aggravated assault against two other civilians and failing to adhere to the military's rules of engagement.

The charges represent the fifth case involving alleged unlawful killings in Iraq to have been brought against Camp Pendleton Marines since the U.S. invasion in March 2003.

A hearing for Winnick will take place at Camp Pendleton this summer to determine if the charges against him should stand.

The charges were disclosed to the North County Times during a Thursday telephone conversation with Gary Myers, a civilian attorney who has been hired to represent Winnick. He added he had just been brought into the case and had not yet received a full briefing.

A Marine attorney with intimate knowledge of the case also confirmed the charges, which have not been made public by base officials.

According to a charging document, Winnick is alleged to have killed the civilians on June 17 while operating out of Combat Outpost Golden near Lake Tharthar in Iraq's western Anbar province. The charges also allege he fired at two others without first making a positive determination that any of the civilians posed a threat.

Winnick was a member of Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Division working with the base's 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit when the incident occurred.

"The basic allegation is that he shot these people without justification and not having positively identified them as having hostile intent," said the Marine attorney who requested anonymity because the charges have not yet been announced publicly.

If ordered to trial and convicted, Winnick could face up to 40 years in prison and a dishonorable discharge. He was on his fourth combat assignment when the incident occurred, according to the Marine attorney.

Prosecutors have asked that a fact-finding Article 32 hearing for Winnick take place as soon as next week, but his attorneys are requesting a delay to give them more time to prepare their case.

Twenty other base troops have been charged with unlawful killings in Iraq.

Seven Marines and a Navy corpsman were charged in 2006 with the killing of a retired Iraqi policeman. All were convicted or pleaded guilty to offenses related to that incident, with the squad leader in that case, former Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III, convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison. His sentence was later commuted to 11 years behind bars.

Four officers and four enlisted men from the base were charged with offenses in the slaying of two dozen Iraqi civilians in the city of Haditha in 2005. Six of the eight, including an enlisted man represented by Myers, have since been acquitted or had charges withdrawn.

A fourth case involves the killing of four suspected insurgents that a squad of Marines detained during fighting in the city of Fallujah in 2004. Two Marines are being prosecuted on murder charges at Camp Pendleton in that incident while their squad leader, Jose L. Nazario, is being prosecuted as a civilian in U.S. District Court in Riverside because he is no longer in the Marine Corps and not subject to recall into the service.

The fifth case involved the killing of an Iraqi army soldier by Lance Cpl. Delano Holmes after the two got into a fight while standing guard duty at Camp Fallujah on Dec. 31, 2006. Holmes was convicted by a base jury of negligent homicide last December, ordered reduced in rank and given a bad conduct discharge.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: defendourmarines; marines; pendleton; sniper; winnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: RedRover
From a legal standpoint, this is a horrible case.

To sustain a conviction, the prosecution must prove the accused's state of mind. They must prove that he didn't think he had enough justification to fire.

He can state that long before he fired, he had been observing them and those around them, that in his experience they are taking action that would have eventually resulted in the deaths or wounding of Marines. that he had seen others do the same thing, etc.

It's a bit like a probably cause hearing. A cop can just about say “Your Honor, they just looked hinkey to me and they made suspicious movements, so I stopped and searched them and in the course of that search I found..... “ and get it admitted.

21 posted on 06/05/2008 7:31:10 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Probably = probable

Bad Spill Chucker


22 posted on 06/05/2008 7:33:40 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Lancey Howard; SeaHawkFan

We’ll try to get more info and keep you posted. I do know that the sergeant was being leaned on hard by prosecutors. Myers put a stop to that.


23 posted on 06/05/2008 7:33:55 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops,org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I’m glad he has Gary Myers. I hope he rips ‘em apart.


24 posted on 06/05/2008 7:41:38 PM PDT by ticked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

IS this NEW?


25 posted on 06/05/2008 7:45:42 PM PDT by lilycicero (Your myspace ad here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilycicero

Yep, a new one. Three deployments, 3 investigations. Seems to be a pattern going on here, huh?


26 posted on 06/05/2008 7:47:54 PM PDT by ticked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I’ll keep an eye out too and let you know of anything.


27 posted on 06/05/2008 7:50:07 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Don’t need any evidence.

He’s innocent until proven guilty.

Patriots will understand that.


28 posted on 06/05/2008 7:58:09 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; Jarhead2844; USMCWriter; 1stbn27; 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ..

Bump, skeeter, and a ping.


29 posted on 06/05/2008 8:05:30 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine Niece, Daughter, Wife, Friend, Sister, Cousin, Mom and FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ticked

They like getting the guys that have a last name begin with

W


30 posted on 06/05/2008 8:05:56 PM PDT by lilycicero (Pattern solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

WTH is going on? Who has the final say on who to prosecute for what?


31 posted on 06/05/2008 8:17:25 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilycicero

makes as much sense as anything else.


32 posted on 06/05/2008 8:20:17 PM PDT by ticked (I had to think for a second or three on that one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Red - is this the new case that Nat has been referring to?


33 posted on 06/05/2008 8:31:09 PM PDT by Chickenhawk Warmonger (The Media Lied & Soldiers Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
Yes, and a travesty. What the hey. Many of you guys have been there, done that. The article doesn't specify if Winnick was fired on first, but stands to reason that if you hesitate long enough to identify hostile intent, you stand a better than even chance of being very dead.
34 posted on 06/05/2008 8:50:35 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (The object is to come home alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; jazusamo; xzins; Girlene; freema; darrylsharratt; Shelayne; Lancey Howard; lilycicero; ...

Sad Bump.


35 posted on 06/05/2008 8:58:40 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank

If you look back at all the threads...for every good news, we get tackled (I know I used a football term just for you)
by something to bring us back down to boo from the stands.


36 posted on 06/05/2008 9:10:58 PM PDT by lilycicero (Drill team.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Don’t need any evidence.

He’s innocent until proven guilty.

Patriots will understand that.

Common sense BUMP!

37 posted on 06/05/2008 9:15:11 PM PDT by 4woodenboats (defendourtroops.org defendourmarines.org freeevanvela.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

This is getting ridiculous. There has to be a common thread, an antagonist, behind all these trials. Someone’s pushing hard and it’s about time we pushed back...


38 posted on 06/05/2008 9:52:01 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
If there's anything that really gets me enraged, it is seeing the stream of prosecutions of our soldiers. Numerous terrorists have been
1) sent to Gitmo
2) had their “hardships” cried about by our liberal lefties
3) released
4) killed or discovered committing another atrocity after release

All within the duration of the prosecution of our soldiers.
This doesn't even count the imprisonment that the soldiers may be facing.

39 posted on 06/05/2008 11:03:22 PM PDT by Galt2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickenhawk Warmonger

Unfortunately, no.


40 posted on 06/06/2008 12:59:30 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops,org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson