Replies

My guess is most of them will return to the Democratic fold,

I don't think so. These women feel burned by the anti-Clinton sentiment of the press and the DNC, which in their view is more than slightly tinged with misogyny. From what I've been reading on Democratic blogs, a lot of them feel outraged and disgusted by the party bigwigs' preference for a lesser qualifed male candidate over a female candidate with superior intelligence/credentials. They are deeply disillusioned with the party.

These women are delusional as far as claimed differences in the intelligence and qualifications of the two contenders in the Democrat Party. Aside from being in the Senate one term less than the Wicked Witch of the East, Urkel has about the same mediocre record of legislative accomplishment that she has. He HAS voted to her left, but Hillary as a centrist is merely Lenin doing ‘two steps forward, one step back’. They're both Marxists.

As for intellect, I've never seen ANY indication Hillary Clinton is particularly intelligent. Educated? Yes. A grind? Most likely. But never confuse intelligence with education.

As to her accomplishments, they arise from sleeping with a guy on the way up, and at the top of his game. And they are FEW in number. Janet Reno. Donna Shalayla come to mind. Clinton Care was hardly a success. Her biggest accomplishments? The ‘War Room’ and ‘so-called ‘Bimbo’ control.

When push gets to shove, this is all about Democrat ‘Identity politics’. And her group of victims isn't happy that his group of victims came out ahead.

You're right about their anger and disillusionment. Throughout the primary season, I've had a hunch that Hillary feels like the fat girl in the classroom who can't get any attention from the football players. And that frustration is being writ large amongst her supporters.

But when it comes down to it: will any Hillary supporters vote for a pro-life candidate? I really doubt it.