Replies

ADDING to post no. 560:

Posting these link here for archival purposes only.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/legaljihad

http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/letters/story.html?id=a5618506-66f2-4393-9743-cd6e3d53e945

Note: The following post is a quote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2026723/posts

FreeRepublic Posts Introduced Into Evidence Against Mark Steyn
June 5, 2008
Posted on June 5, 2008 3:13:11 PM PDT by AJFavish

Interviewed by Hugh Hewitt today, Mark Steyn said that posts from FreeRepublic were introduced into evidence in the Canadian proceeding against him.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2026698/posts

“But we were getting along so well!”
MCLEANS Online ^ | 06.05.08 | The one and only Mark Steyn
Posted on June 5, 2008 2:29:33 PM PDT by knews_hound

http://www.macleans.ca/

http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080604_84794_84794

“But we were getting along so well!
Geez, these days I don’t seem able to step out of the house without committing a hate crime”
MARK STEYN | June 4, 2008 |

OPINION - SNIPPET: “The charge levelled against Maclean’s by the Canadian Islamic Congress is that, in publishing an excerpt from my book, this magazine exposed Muslims to “hatred and contempt.” Alas, at the first day of the Great Maclean’s Show Trial at the British Columbia “Human Rights” Tribunal, the well of my book excerpt’s “hatred and contempt” pretty well ran dry in the first hour. So Faisal Joseph, counsel for the plaintiff Mohamed Elmasry, was forced to bus in a huge pile of miscellaneous generic “hatred and contempt” from all kinds of other sources.”