OPINION:
That’s really sad.
How many can say they own a building that can stand up to terrorism?
I don’t know of anyone.
That’s wealth redistribution, in my opinion.
That said, there are things you can do...like posts at the entrances of buildings so that people can’t drive through. Reinforced structures, 24/7 working security cameras, armed security guards; 24/7 building patrols, reporting suspicious incidents/persons, etc., all good, but can this prevent all forms of terrorism?
No.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2028642/posts?page=2#2
#
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2028642/posts
“Hugo’s Head Fake”
IBD ^ | June 9, 2008
Posted on June 9, 2008 6:57:37 PM PDT by Kaslin
I don’t know of anyone.
I don't either. The ruling defies common sense and logic. Persistance is known to be a terrorism precursor. Sooner or later every structure (no matter where located) is potentially vulnerable. Affixing the smallest denominator of responsibility to the terrorist(s) is mind-boggling IMHO.