You may or may not be full of crap. Roger Stone may or may not be full of crap.
But I have a newfound respect for Hillary Clinton. She has no quit in her and will make any terrorist sorry they ever heard her name if they cross her.
I’d rather have her defending this country as Commander in Chief.
This is the scorched earth stuff that only the Clintons’ are capable of.
It sucks if you are a capitalist, libertarian when it is used against you.
But if you are an enemy of America or Barack Obama...
You have to take your hat off to them. Greatness is greatness.
Rush saved Hillary’s bacon.
Let's not get too carried away :)
No need to get carried away.
I don’t think that the win at all costs, never quit mentality is good in itself.
Remember, as a young attorney, Hillary attacked the credibility of a 12 year old rape victim and got her rapist client off. I remember recently reading that the girl to this day hasn’t gotten over it.
Yes, attorneys do this sort of thing every day but most of them don’t go on to try to portray themselves as the saviors of all womanhood just so they can get ultimate power.
Sounds like Hillary does to you what Obama does to Chris Matthews?
May we remember that the 'Toons gutted the military in the 90's, did not respond to terrorist bombings overseas and flubbed the opportunity to grab OBL. She will kowtow to her leftist pacifists puppetmasters if she gets in and will be weak on military matters just like last time she was Pres.
Eric, I am glad to see you this, and have to say me too.
I can’t believe it, but with mccain the only choice she looks pretty good to me. I think she would be more main stream than mccain.
Sheesh
Im no Clinton fan but Ive got to give hillary her due on this. She has been tenacious and focused. I hated the woman for years and while there is much I still don’t agree with Ive got to admire her moxie. If she was sincere when commenting on Iran “we would obliterate them” ahmadinejad should check into insuring his gonads.lol
Her actions that you respect today are strictly mercenary, not from conviction...driven by her lust for ultimate power and control. Once achieved, she would throw you, and everything you believe in, under the first bus so fast you wouldn't even hear the sound of the engines...
She has no quit in her and will make any terrorist sorry they ever heard her name if they cross her.
We don't need someone who will respond strongly to a terrorist attack...we need someone to destroy them now before they attack again.
Sorry Eric, you're entitled to your opinion, but you've got it all wrong IMO.
It is refreshing to find another Freeper who correctly perceives and understands this reality about the Clintons.
The reality is that a President Hillary Clinton would be the worst nightmare of any terrorists or their nation-state enablers who were stupid enough to stage another 9/11-style attack on us, or even a WMD-type attack on our troops "in theater".
Whereas Obama appears to be a genuinely naive true-believer and incompetent racist/marxist ideologue who would appease and kowtow to our enemies out of "principle", the Clintons are not. Their many collaborations and betrayals with America's enemies were guided mostly by their calculations of how it would profit them, whether financially or in terms of political power.
The Clintons governed almost completely by polls. If terrorists attacked us a la 9/11 during a Hillary Clinton administration and their pollsters told her that an outraged American public would turn on her if she failed to "take-out" the enemy, she would act ruthlessly and without hesitation.
Moreover, Hillary's response would not be hampered by the quisling sabotage of the MSM, the so-called "loyal opposition" party, and the leftist academia, CIA, State Department, Uinted Nations, et al. which has crippled President Bush's efforts to deal with our enemies.
The country's entire treasonous leftist Establishment, which has done everything possible to sabotage and undermine President Bush and our troops while they are in harms way would turn on a dime and be Hillary's biggest cheerleaders as she demonstrated "strong leadership" in obliterating our enemies...
While the Bush administration has had to move tentatively and has made horrible military and political blunders simply because of their fear of "bad press" and political sabotage at home, a President Hillary could erase entire cities from the face of the Earth with hardly a peep...
And, if her polls and calculations told her she had to do so in order to maintain her political power in office, she would act unhesitatingly, ruthlessly and without any of the moral qualms, compassion and consideration for the collateral-damage deaths of "innocent civilians". If you don't believe the Clintons will kill innocent civilians by the thousands without blinking, just go ask the Serbs...
Bottom line - any terrorists who crossed a President Hillary would probably soon find themselves missing the relative restraint of the Bush Administration... /grin
You very well may have lost your marbles.....but the old woman is better than Odumbo. I suggest a McCain/Hillary ticket, I don’t have to vote for them, yet they can take it to the bank and win.
Now, I am gonna go puke.
And if you think that she will use that “fighting spirit” to defend America, you are pathetically misled.
She is as Marxist as Obama, but has played the middle better. If she gets into office, she will drive this country so far to the left, we'll al have Pacific Ocean real estate.
If our enemies attacks us, she will use that to impose the Iron Fist of control over all our lives.
Make no mistake about it, what ‘Reverend’ Wright says about America is in Hillary's heart, too. Don't be fooled by the best liars this country has seen since FDR's regime.
The only thing the Clintons are concerned about is themselves.