This “Dr.” gives a laundry list of behaviors that define a “sociopath” and then at the end considers it an “illness”. Which is it, culpable behavior or non-culpable illness?
Ugh, I think I might be a sociopath...I never remember birthdays!
Some of us have known about the Clintons for a very long time. For me, it is amazing that so many people could have been successfully deceived for so long.
Ping!
Hillary see this in the mirror.
I've said it before, but wow these liberals sure do learn slowly.
bump
Actually, I have been worrying since last summer that some nut with a gun might target either major candidate. Does that make me a sociopath. I will never forget the days of death—JFK, Martin Luther King Jr., and RFK. As a young bride cried for a week thinking about Jackie losing her husband, with MLK had to flee the city as looters were running in front of my house with cases of liquor on their heads, the evening after RFK’s death a housemate came home in tears as he and a whole roomful of people had been held up at gunpoint. Then there were the children killed in a church bombing, a white housewife murdered while driving a young freedom rider back north, three young men murder and their killer only tried very recently.
These were bad, bad times, and as a young women they shocked me deeply. As a teenager, I wonder how much more deeply Hillary may have been affected. Could just be the stupid expression out loud of something a number of us have probably been thinking.
“This is not a slip of the tongue, but a practiced and smooth glide as it sticks itself out at the PUBLIC—having darted out for a few dry-runs two other times”
Typical liberals at the Daily KOS — they mystically know what people’s motives are and what drives them.
Can you imagine this shrieking nutwad at a negotiation table with Iran? eesh.
This was the 3rd time since March she mentioned the assassination of RFK.
I think my tagline says it all.
Bump for an important article on exposing Hilery, the Red Queen. Not the source too. Even Democrats are starting to wake up on the dangers of allowing her anywhere near power.
That wouldn't have been accurate.
I don’t think she slipped up. The Democrate party is one which votes for the next sociopath and plead innocence and hate if their cause for their Che, Castro or Hitler is not defended. They are the advocates of evil, and that is PC.
Since Hilary could not denounce those ways and thus Obama (one more radical than her), she could only show more radicalism than him via another way. She conjured up the witches which control and manipulate this election and probably asked for some advice. From her death-oriented point of view of the adult whore, ie. irresponsible yet feminist in authority of adult over “children” who should not question her, she has made an irresponsible statement as such adult.
She only slipped a little bit in form, but not in substance. She did not express well enough the “confidence” of the irresponsible whore who “humanisticaly” deserves her entitled feminist respect... and she is adored after all.
But that slip up is not so bad. Damage control is made by the leftist’s press false outrage, and it makes her look “clumsy” and cute at it almost.
What she did is perfectly logical. She is bringing more death, and, just like the Monica scandal made it all so “proper” and “good looking” to lie in court and betray sexualy people around, it has fed further the fantasies of such psychologists who fantasize of maturity and of intellectual untouchability, moralization status entitlement and “irresponsible ‘cool’ like adult” attitude.
The world will learn that God and the Bible is no fantasy and not childlish, and, guilt is not either feeding much of fantasies. Look at the log in your eye before you remove the speck in the other’s, indeed.
Hmmm. So it's just about the abstraction known as Clinton's political persona? Not the entire person? In that case, it certainly isn't a diagnosis, it's more like a metaphor or a smear.
It's no fun having to defend Clinton, but really now, why spend all that time and ink depicting her as a sociopath if you don't really want to be on record as believing it, and if you disclaim your own words in the end?
There are no part persons. If she's a sociopath, she's not just a political sociopath successfully compartmentalized by a normal person. Or if she is, why not go with the older metaphor and call her possessed?
Proponents of character disorder theory, criminal profiling, and sociopatholgical theory and practice see these taxonomies as far as real-life applications as overlapping and their various traits as existing on a continuum.
Oh, I see! There's a continuuuuuum. And she is at milepost number what?
With a continuuuuuum, you can label...er, taxonomize anyone! You don't have to prove anything, or even be precise, because everything's "overlapping." Just affect the objective, scientific style, wield the language of science, and you can change minds. Or whatever they now call minds, and I'm certain it's imaginative.
THE DIARIST: Is a college English instructor
Nuff said!
whose graduate and undergraduate work included courses such as "literature and psychoanalysis" and so she easily assumes the role of amateur psychologist.
Ok then, forget it --
Has been a candidate in two graduate psychology programs,
Really, I get it now
one in Forensic Psychology, but finished neither.
Stop, you're killing me!
Did complete the requirements for a two year degree in "The Administration of Justice" and has been an intern in juvenile probation.
Bwahahahahaha!!