[djf]

I have wondered about these types of questions. I am interested in physics and math not so much for the actual results, as the theoretical implications. Epistemology and heuristics.

There is another very interesting result of Bell.

According to Einsteins theory, we can “rotate” the four dimensional space so that “time” becomes a linear dimension, and one of the linear dimensions rotates to become time.

The gist of this is that Bells theorem that talks about non-locality of space applies equally well - to time.

So, it would seem at least, that it is not theoretically impossible for you to open up your door tomorrow and see a baby pterodactyl there.

Or possibly - and I emphasize this is just educated speculation - change the past.

I have Bell’s set of lectures “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics” I can understand alot of it, but in some places, the math is just too daunting.

And BTW, the last I heard, the Aspect experiments have been done, and managed to completely and decisively prove that Bell was right. That non-locality is a fact.

[Eye On The Left]

And BTW, the last I heard, the Aspect experiments have been done, and managed to completely and decisively prove that Bell was right. That non-locality is a fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments

[Eye On The Left]

The gist of this is that Bells theorem that talks about non-locality of space applies equally well - to time.

Isn't that where the instantaneous stuff comes in?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_Paradox

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation