Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TraditionalistMommy

TraditionalistMommy: “Would you have supported leaving interracial marriage to a vote? Looks as though it would have been illegal until about 1991.”

You are completely, totally missing the point. This issue isn’t for a handful of judges to decide. They simply redefined the law to fit a particular agenda you may or may not agree with. If they can remake the law to mean whatever they want, there is absolutely no real limit to what they can do, and you and I are no longer free. Even voting them off won’t fix the damage they have already done.

Now you may think the judges acted morally in this, but again, it is NOT for them to make up law. They have seized power against the will of the people, and no American should tolerate this open rebellion against the rule of law! Want gay marriage legalized? Then get people to agree with you and vote to change the law. Don’t use judges to do your dirty work for you. That is the way of the left.


303 posted on 05/15/2008 5:36:24 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Republican Who Will NOT Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenUSA

You didn’t answer the question. Based on your response, it looks as though you would have preferred the legality of interracial marriage be left to a vote. Is that correct?


304 posted on 05/15/2008 5:37:25 PM PDT by TraditionalistMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA

See post 419. :-)


422 posted on 05/15/2008 10:59:59 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson