[manc]

you said
but same-sex couples can (theoretically) adopt. I’m of the mind that a child is better off in a two-parent same-sex household than a single-parent household or the horrible state institutions for the poor children who have no parents.

Wrong you are way wrong

I was put into foster homes all my life growing up , So I know about this
I saw kids with mums and dads.
I did have a foster mum most times and so much wanted a father not another mum

I too wanted my own mum and dad, I wanted mum for comfort, love, sympathy etc
I wanted Dad to teach me about cars, sports, etc

I never would have wanted to mums or two dads
two dads cannot ever tell a girl how she will feel when she goes on her first date
they cannot tell her about puberty and how she will feel
they cannot tell her about how she feels on her first kiss
etc etc

So you are way off on what you said, totally way off

you might think so but I know so from experience

so best not to assume on this

[MinnesotaLibertarian]

I’m not speaking about foster homes. I’m talking about oprhanages, or whatever the new PC term they use for them is. I agree that it’s best for kids to grow up with a mother and a father, but it’s not currently realistic for that to happen for every kid. Which is better; a safe home with two same-sex parents, or state-run pit?