Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo
"Yep. Just like all the things we were promised with George Bush II...DEFINITELY the LESSER OF TWO EVILS."

1) During the Bush Administration Libya gives up its nuclear weapons program.

2) During the Bush Administration the black market from Pakistan led by A.Q.Kahn for nuclear weapons technology is broken up.

3) During the Bush Administration North Korea begins dismantling their plutonium enrichment reactors.

4) During the Bush Administration Israel and the U.S.A. destroy Syria's nuclear weapons enrichment reactors.

5) During the Bush Administration, Saddam Hussein who said quite clearly while in jail awaiting his trial that he would have had the U.N. sanctions broken and be in full production of WMDs within a year. That would be the years 2004 - 2005 approximately that Saddam would have been re-armed with WMDs. It now goes without saying the obvious that Saddam will not be getting nuclear weapons anytime soon. Nor will he be directly funding and training the terror group 'Islamic Jihad' which is al-Qaeda and whom blew up two U.S. embassies. (see the recent: Iraqi Perspectives Project).

6) During the Bush Administration the U.S.A. has nuclear weapon ambitious Iran pinned in on both sides from Afghanistan and Iraq which is pure strategic genius.

Under Clinton the countries Pakistan and India successfully test nuclear weapons and North Korea begins plutonium enrichment .

Thank your GWB and Bush family! The world is indeed safer.

15 posted on 05/14/2008 9:08:20 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: avacado
And, during the Bush administration, my taxes went down. Thank you Dubya. I like paying lower taxes.

If McCain beats Obama, you will not be paying as much in taxes
22 posted on 05/14/2008 9:11:43 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: avacado
Despite my severe disappointment with W, I'd vote for him again. He has been great on judges, adequate on the war and good on taxes. He has been lousy on PR, and he has given in to the libs for his last 2 years, but his first 6 were ok.

He has been a good caretaker, which is not as good as being an historic figure, but not as bad as being a disaster, like Carter. He has advanced conservatism in some ways during his Presidency, which means we are better off now than we would have been without him.

McCain, on the other hand.....I'm not sure conservatism would advance with him. His best selling point is that liberalism would, we think, not advance as swiftly with McCain as with Obama. But it would advance, from global warming, to illegal aliens, to restrictions on speech, to caving on everything that liberals want. Great, he is stronger on the war. So he would keep us safe in our liberal lair.

59 posted on 05/14/2008 9:25:31 PM PDT by Defiant (McCain's big vein drains mainly from his brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: avacado

Even on this board, the W haters don’t want the truth pointed out to them. Once he supported amnesty, and did not close the borders like they wanted - with a fence - nothing he did was worthwhile.


252 posted on 05/15/2008 5:53:11 AM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: avacado

All of those thing are great accomplishments but what have the Republicans on Capital Hill have to say about them. All I hear is silence. Its deafening.


359 posted on 05/15/2008 5:47:42 PM PDT by kempo (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson