Democrats cause a reduction in the supply of energy and therefore a rise in price. When the impact finally starts to hurt people they blame the greedy oil companies. And none in the MSM ever calls them on it.
The MSM *are* Democrats. Why would they?
The real problem is that people seriously consider what the MSM reports to be 1) accurate and 2) relevant. The Russian people figured it out. Why can't we?
I think it's our responsibility to teach people within our circle of influence that the MSM's goal is to teach you what to think about issues of their choosing. First thing you can do is understand that the truth is probably exactly the opposite of any story the MSM reports. Second thing is that what is being reported is not really important, but is what the MSM wants you to focus on.
The little blips that are reported and then vanish are more likely much bigger issues than our typical daily bombardment.
You can't challenge the MSM to change because that leaves control in their hands. They put a Limbag or O'Really out there and you have a new spinmeister to tell you what to believe. Except you *really* believe this one because the MSM makes them appear to be 1) accurate and 2) relevant. You have merely exchanged authorities. You still believe what the MSM serves up.
Trying to make the MSM 'change' is the wrong approach. Recognize them for what they are and don't act on their 'advice'. That's the only way to fight it.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but even if the amount sold doesn't increase doesn't the government stand to make more and more money as the price of oil, gasoline, et. al. increases?
Let's say oil is $10 a gallon and the tax 10%. The government skims off (as opposed to actually making) a buck. When oil goes to $15 the government's cut rises to $1.50; $18.00=$1.80, etc. Sure, people and industries might buy less but would it really matter? The 10% is still the same.
Just wondering...