Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soliton

How convenient. We study the similarities of EXISTING species and then declare the existence of those similarities PROVES evolution. And we can conveniently do away with that horribly unreliable fossil evidence.


24 posted on 05/07/2008 11:11:33 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

See post 20.


28 posted on 05/07/2008 11:22:52 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
How convenient. We study the similarities of EXISTING species and then declare the existence of those similarities PROVES evolution. And we can conveniently do away with that horribly unreliable fossil evidence.

The fossil record was useful because we could compare anatomical features of various extinct animals to study their evolution. There are HUNDREDS of "transitional forms" in the fossil record that meet the definition of the creationists. However, ALL species are transitional species. That's why there gone and new ones have arissen.

Anatomical features are physical representations of the genes (phenotypes)that produce them. When looking at the genetic information directly, we are looking at the recipe for a specific species. We no longer need to look at imperfect accidentally preserved specimens.

32 posted on 05/07/2008 11:31:24 AM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson