Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clock King
I thought this was already established?

True, I know of two separate DNA studies as early as 1996 that established this fact. Also to my surprise, anthropologists generally reject Cro Magnon as precedent species to homo sapian sapain (man). Research on this dates back as early as 1978. So that are two "links" missing right before man on the evolutionary chain. But no need to throw out evolution since there is much consensus on the issue.

20 posted on 05/05/2008 12:02:40 PM PDT by 11th Commandment (McCain makes me crazy- Obama scares the cr*p out of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Commandment

So, am I right that no direct ancestor for homo-sapiens has ever been discovered? All that were conjectured as that immediate ancestor have been proven not to be?


27 posted on 05/05/2008 12:11:47 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson