Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Howard Dean: Florida and Michigan Delegations Will Be Seated
Patterico ^ | 05/03/2008 | Patterico

Posted on 05/03/2008 6:16:36 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last
To: Freedom Dignity n Honor
>If they don't count the delegates from Florida and Michigan then they violate the law by not letting the votes that elected the delegates count.

Wrong on the face of it.
I do not know where that popular misconception started, other than to say that most people's education precludes actually researching and thinking, but rather includes only being told something, ie, dogma.

There is absolutely no basis in law that could force a political party to count votes for a nominee, or to even have votes for a nominee.

The SCOTUS has already ruled that political parties are, in fact, just that.
Private organizations that are free to choose their leaders in any way that they deem fit.

It might also surprise you to know that you have absolutely no Federal legal right to vote directly for POTUS.
That is left to the states, who then send off electors, who can still vote pretty much as they please. - in theory.

The only legal voting right that you have on a Federal level is that vote for your respective Senator.

Thank you for your post. - bill

121 posted on 05/04/2008 9:34:38 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: billmor
...She could pick someone like Joe Biden, smart, likable, sense of humor, always ready with a comeback, just a bit slow connecting the dots..She’ll want someone with few negatives

Are there two Joe Bidens????

122 posted on 05/04/2008 9:46:52 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Typical Gun-Toting, Jesus-Loving Gramma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Possibly the best DU thread on how unhinged they are becoming is here as more and more of them openly hate Hillary for not dropping out and for daring to expose Obama.

I swear if McCain becomes the next president of the United States, I may have to disconnect my Internet connection or else the profanity I will post towards Hillary will be of a kind that would make Baby Jesus cry (and make no mistake it will be Hillary's fault if McCain beats Obama in November).

124 posted on 05/04/2008 10:22:49 AM PDT by Sender ("Why is it that I can't just eat my waffle?" - Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Here’s your chair at the convention in Denver doesn’t mean he’s your vote.
No Michigan delegate should get to vote. They can’t agree on dividing up the delegates because it’s not in Obama’s interest to do so.

He can wrap up the nomination without coming to an agreement on MI or FL.


125 posted on 05/04/2008 10:48:32 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

If you think after tens and tens of millions of dollars spent with the nomination just within his grasp that Obama is going to lay down for the Beast, I have a bridge to sell you.

By the end of the state voting, Obama will at most need a hundred or less of the remaining SPDs (Super Politician Delegates) to wrap up the nomination. That is less than a third most likely counting the ones who will fall his way before the voting ends. (Add in the drips coming in now this past week.)

So please tell us your theory and pass those drugs too.


126 posted on 05/04/2008 10:51:34 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Boy can you please say that again. What is wrong with people here who think a marxist in the White House is better than McCain.

Hold your nose and pull the lever. And get over yourselves.


127 posted on 05/04/2008 10:54:46 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Those “wins” were contrived.

That's Obama's argument, and you can bet we're going to here it again and again. Ultimately, I think it will win the day, but only good things can come from raging floor fight between Barry and the Hildabeast.

128 posted on 05/04/2008 10:57:46 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

We had our chance and could not unify behind a winning candidate.
I’m holding my nose and pulling the lever for the old man.
Not sitting by to watch (either) marxist take the Oval Office.

No way.


129 posted on 05/04/2008 10:58:03 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Rush and his "Operation Chaos" are throwing the election to Hillary for some unspoken reason.

I don't think so. Her odds of winning the nomination are very, very low. All Rush is doing is making sure the nomination battle lasts as long as possible, maximizing the damage to Obama, who will be the ultimate nominee.

130 posted on 05/04/2008 10:59:54 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Disco Dave

Republicans aren’t going to win. The Democrats are going to lose.


131 posted on 05/04/2008 11:01:39 AM PDT by JHBowden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Her odds of winning the nomination are very, very low.

Clintons cheat.

This very thread is about how Dean is now saying they will seat the Florida and Michigan delegates, thereby once again breaking the DNC's own rules.

Her odds of winning the nomination are 50/50. And when it concerns the Clintons, those are horrible odds for the country.

132 posted on 05/04/2008 11:10:02 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: mccainvoterinobamaville

Welcome to FR. What part of Illinois are you in?


133 posted on 05/04/2008 11:14:58 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

If this is true about the delegates, how come it isn’t a lead story at the FoxNews website, CNN’s website, or ABC’s website?

This is big news in terms of the delegate count and potential nominee.

There isn’t anything up on Drudge, either.

Where is the story?


134 posted on 05/04/2008 11:17:49 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Pocketa, pocketa, pocketa.


135 posted on 05/04/2008 11:22:32 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Sender
I swear if McCain becomes the next president of the United States, I may have to disconnect my Internet connection or else the profanity I will post towards Hillary will be of a kind that would make Baby Jesus cry (and make no mistake it will be Hillary's fault if McCain beats Obama in November).

Is there some way we can hold this DUmmie to this pledge?

136 posted on 05/04/2008 11:24:47 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
Boy can you please say that again. What is wrong with people here who think a marxist in the White House is better than McCain. Hold your nose and pull the lever. And get over yourselves.

Bears repeating. Just win, baby!

137 posted on 05/04/2008 11:26:50 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Where is this story?

Very first sentence:

Howard Dean appeared on the Daily Show and said definitively that the Michigan and Florida delegations will be seated. (H/t Scott Jacobs.) The video is here.

138 posted on 05/04/2008 11:33:50 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Ooh, this is NOT going to go over well at the lib boards where a good majority are supporting the Obamanation. The Obamanation wasn’t even on the ballot in one of those states. Hillary must be cackling with delight.


139 posted on 05/04/2008 11:38:48 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity; Dr. Eckleburg

I would add that not only is it unlikely in the extreme that she’ll be the nominee, if they make her the nominee it will be a disaster for them. Imagine the contrast between Chicago ‘68 Part II in Denver and the steady-as-a-rock convention in Minneapolis. Hillary will have to spend the next two months excising the image of 10,000 neo-hippies throwing baggies of feces at the Denver PD instead of talking about policy, while McCain touts a workable health care plan and other stuff that has to do with actual leadership.


140 posted on 05/04/2008 11:40:22 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson