Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jindal appears on "Tonight Show"
Times-Picayune ^ | 4/28/2008, | MELINDA DESLATTE

Posted on 04/29/2008 7:18:17 AM PDT by Melpomene

Gov. Bobby Jindal touted Louisiana's hurricane recovery efforts and tossed aside rumors he could be a possible running mate for Republican presidential contender John McCain, when he appeared Monday on NBC's "Tonight Show."

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: bobbyjindal; jindal; leno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: abb

The voters gave that idiotic plan the thumbs-up, not Jindal.

Jindal 16!


21 posted on 04/30/2008 6:54:53 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Senate Bill 87 by Buddy Shaw would repeal part of the Stelly Tax increase. Baton Rouge is awash in money, yet Jindal does not want individuals to have a tax cut.

He is fighting SB87. You will have your eyes opened before too long.


22 posted on 04/30/2008 7:01:38 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Moon is talking about it now.
http://www.moongriffon.com/


23 posted on 04/30/2008 7:11:37 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abb

Lets see how things shape up over the next four - eight years.


24 posted on 04/30/2008 7:11:58 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Baton Rouge is floating in money right now. By the time all the deadheads have spent the money, there won’t be any left for a tax cut.

If we don’t get it this session, we won’t get it at all.


25 posted on 04/30/2008 7:13:49 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: abb

Oh, I understand they were against the bill. I’m just hoping their given reason—that they want the tax cuts to be matched with spending cuts—is real.


26 posted on 04/30/2008 7:17:35 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: abb

Like I said, lets see how the state shapes up in the next four - eight years. If he gets us remotely out of the Banana Republic we’re in, I’ll forgive him the Stelly plan (which, as noted earlier, the idiot voters in the state passed in the first place).


27 posted on 04/30/2008 7:19:25 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Lived the first 24 years of my life in LA and now live in Alaska. Don’t be enamored with Palin. She is not what she appears to be. She would more likely be a candidate with McCain as they are both RINO’s of the first order. Bobby Jindal on the other hand appears to be the real thing. He would be very wise to avoid the McCain/Palin types. Sorry to burst your bubble but the same thing happened to me after I supported Sarah with time, money and effort for the election here.


28 posted on 04/30/2008 7:21:34 AM PDT by strongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
So why then do the Jindal allies load up a clean bill with a larger tax cut if they say they need spending cuts? That makes no sense.

Do you not realize that Louisiana's budget has doubled over the past five years? Unless we get our money back in tax cuts they'll spend every damn dime.

29 posted on 04/30/2008 7:23:14 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Four years. Eight years. Just how long must we wait for the Drunken Sailors in Baton Rouge to stop spending our money.


30 posted on 04/30/2008 7:24:37 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb

Why don’t we worry about getting them to stop stealing it first? Oh wait; he’s doing that.


31 posted on 04/30/2008 7:26:10 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

I want my money back. I earned it, they stole it and are using it to buy votes with.

They’ve had money so far this year to give every deadhead state employee from Tallulah to Sulphur a pay raise.

When do those who pay get it back?


32 posted on 04/30/2008 7:31:48 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: abb
Are you just learning that now? Like Chris Rock says, You don't pay taxes; they TAKE taxes. Or, if you prefer a more conservative voice, Ronald Reagan: The taxpayer - that's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination.

Look, I feel your pain. I live in New Orleans and spend every day looking at the failed social experiments government has shoved down our throats and forced us to pay for. Any little step toward improvement makes me happy. I'm not going to hang my hat on one issue.

33 posted on 04/30/2008 7:41:52 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Jindall’s people were working the floor yesterday afternoon trying to kill the tax cut bill via amendment. I saw it with my own eyes. It’s that simple.

Republicans are supposed to be for tax cuts. At least they used to be.


34 posted on 04/30/2008 7:48:23 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: abb

I thought I’d lived under bad tax governance here in MA and NY, but you certainly have my sympathy in LA. I personally think governments at all levels should be about a third the size they are now, so I’m with you on tax cuts.

But I think Bush really hurt the Republican Party by increasing spending so radically in his administration. If I’m to understand Jindal’s position has been against the more moderate original tax cut because it wasn’t coupled with spending, but then his group backed the larger tax cuts, still without accompanying spending cuts, that was designed to defeat the more moderate cuts?

Yes, alas, it does sound like some serious politicking. I just hate being disillusioned over and over again by Republicans who talk the talk and then end up enlarging government when the get a chance. I was/am somehow still hoping for better from Jindal, but it doesn’t sound good.


35 posted on 04/30/2008 7:49:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
If I’m to understand Jindal’s position has been against the more moderate original tax cut because it wasn’t coupled with spending, but then his group backed the larger tax cuts, still without accompanying spending cuts, that was designed to defeat the more moderate cuts?

That's exactly what happened. I was watching it live on TV.

36 posted on 04/30/2008 7:52:19 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: abb

Fine. After he gets Louisiana out of the dump and runs for president, you can vote against him.


37 posted on 04/30/2008 7:55:41 AM PDT by Melpomene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Melpomene

Unless he changes his ways purty damn quick, I will not vote for him for re-election. I don’t see a whole lot of changes yet.

Tax, tax, tax. Spend, spend, spend.


38 posted on 04/30/2008 8:01:42 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All

Jindal website

http://gov.louisiana.gov/


39 posted on 04/30/2008 8:38:57 AM PDT by JUMPIN JEHOSPOHAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Fax Weekly at http://www.lapolitics.com/index.php

“Backed into supporting a bill to cut up to $300 million in income taxes, Gov. Jindal told a Shreveport radio station he will sign the bill if it reaches his desk. But he wants the Legislature to make the budget cuts to keep it in balance.

On Tuesday, the Senate debates what has suddenly become the hottest bill of the session, SB 87, which would lower the income tax brackets to the levels before they were increased by the Stelly tax swap plan of 2002. The potentially severe fiscal impact of the bill caused the Jindal administration to oppose it in Revenue & Fiscal Affairs Committee on Monday. That stand caused Jindal to be blistered on conservative talk radio, where reversing the increases from the Stelly plan has been a cause celebre since it was enacted.”


40 posted on 04/30/2008 9:06:14 AM PDT by JUMPIN JEHOSPOHAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson